President Theodore Roosevelt oversaw the realization of a long-term United States goal—a trans-isthmian canal. Throughout the 1800's, American and British leaders and businessmen wanted to ship goods quickly and cheaply between the Atlantic and Pacific coasts.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the first one, having to do with Livingstone viewing Africa as an "untapped resource", since he wanted to extract resources and explore the area. </span></span>
Judaism is a West Asian belief
I'm not sure but I'd say because of Japan, Japan more or less did not get involved in many wars as far as I know. I know that Japan had no reason to go against Korea but still did and sided with China/North Korea. Because of that a lot of hate came from that and since then even sometimes now South Koreans are not very fond of Japanese.
Also I hope no one takes offense that's what I know I'm not saying all Koreans hate Japanese just some...
Hope this helps
In telling the history of the United States and also of the nations of the Western Hemisphere in general, historians have wrestled with the problem of what to call the hemisphere's first inhabitants. Under the mistaken impression he had reached the “Indies,” explorer Christopher Columbus called the people he met “Indians.” This was an error in identification that has persisted for more than five hundred years, for the inhabitants of North and South America had no collective name by which they called themselves.
Historians, anthropologists, and political activists have offered various names, none fully satisfactory. Anthropologists have used “aborigine,” but the term suggests a primitive level of existence inconsistent with the cultural level of many tribes. Another term, “Amerindian,” which combines Columbus's error with the name of another Italian explorer, Amerigo Vespucci (whose name was the source of “America”), lacks any historical context. Since the 1960s, “Native American” has come into popular favor, though some activists prefer “American Indian.” In the absence of a truly representative term, descriptive references such as “native peoples” or “indigenous peoples,” though vague, avoid European influence. In recent years, some argument has developed over whether to refer to tribes in the singular or plural—Apache or Apaches—with supporters on both sides demanding political correctness.
