Answer:
This is a difficult question to explain, and here is my opinion, they shouldn't.
Explanation:
Not allowing mobs to influence government actions, depends on how you define mobs. If they are peaceful protests, then they should be allowed to influence government action, for example, the civil rights movement.
A violent mob would be seen as a rebellion, at a certain extent, and shouldn't be allowed to influence government policies and decisions.
Answer:
<em>b) emphasizing that his only goal was to save the Union.</em>
Explanation:
While Abraham Lincoln is well known for his debates with Stephen Douglas and played an important role in the discussions about slavery he was not an abolitionist. Lincoln was a nationalist that would do anything for the states stay together and avoid a war in the Union. He said in the First Inaugural Address:
" I declare that “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery where it now exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.” Those who nominated and elected me did so with full knowledge that I had made this, and many similar declarations, and had never recanted them.".
His official title would have been the Chancellor of the German Reich, but what he was mostly known as, probably what you’re looking for, would be the German Führer. Führer translates to Leader or Guide.
I believe the answer is D: It revolves around the family unit.
I believe one was the middle east
