Read this law from the Code of Hammurabi and think about which parts seem familiar to you. Then answer the question below.

1 answer:

4 0

You could write your paragraph about the fact that Hammurabi’s code shows evidence of laws. Or the fact that this implies currency or some sort of trade. This also heavily implies a class system which I feel would be easy to write about.

You might be interested in

During the trans-Saharan trade, about _________ slaves were transported to the north. (a) 2,000 (b) 6,000 (c) 20,000 (d) 15,000

stiks02 [169]

Answer:

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Identify the form of government used to rule ancient Egypt, in which the leader, or the pharaoh, was viewed as god-king.

leva [86]

Theocracy I believe is the answer.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

This country is the largest in the world and was once part of the Soviet Union.

lianna [129]

Russia is the answer

4 0

3 years ago

What was the NW Ordinance?

Lapatulllka [165]

Answer:

The Northwest Ordinance enacted July 13, 1787, was an organic act of the Congress of the Confederation of the United States.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

4. Which is NOT a tip provided in the article for having

Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

The correct answer is D. It is not correct to try to convince the other person to agree with you when having a meaningful political conversation.

Explanation:

When talking about political issues, they often deal with controversial issues that can turn friendly talk into heated discussion. Therefore, as a way to prevent this, there are certain guidelines that must be taken into account.

Thus, not shouting, speaking personally and contemplating the opinion of the other party are fundamental criteria when it comes to having a serious and friendly political debate. In this way, cordiality regulates the content of the talk, and the acceptance of the thought different from the other (without the need to share it) gives legitimacy to the idea of the other person.

On the other hand, if in the conversation one of the parties tries to convince the other of its ideology, the conversation will most likely fail. This is so because when trying to convince, the other person's belief or conviction is discredited, a question that many people can take as a personal insult. Therefore, it is totally inadvisable to carry out this type of actions.

4 0

3 years ago