Answer:
1. d) There was a lack of evidence that the students ' actions disrupted learning.
2. c) Students have fewer privacy rights in school than in other public settings.
3. d) Brianna's 1st Amendment rights (freedom of speech) were violated, and her actions did not cause any disruptions to the day-to-day functioning of the school.
4. c) New Jersey v. T.L.O.
5. a) Bell's recording provided grounds for a substantial disruption and interference with normal school activities.
Explanation:
- The court ruled that the school administration's search of T.L.O.'s pocketbook in this instance did not violate the 4th Amendment. The fourth amendment applies to everyone in the school, including the administrators.
- On June 25, 2009, the Supreme Court upheld, reversed, and remanded. In a judgement made by the court in the 4th amendment case of New Jersey v. T. L. O., the Court decided that the search did not meet the "reasonable suspicion" requirement for searches of kids in a school context.
- Due to the policy's vagueness and potential for discriminatory application, the court found it illegal. The court also said that Brianna's 1st Amendment rights had been violated because her actions didn't change how the school normally ran.
<span>From 1847 to 1849, Abraham Lincoln served in the United States Congress. His unpopularity led him to leaving politics for the next 5 years as he pursued his career as a lawyer. He of course later returned to politics and eventually became President of the United States.</span>
It was by democracy it helped people have the right to say.
Answer:
In a year that seemed determined to shake Americans’ confidence in the foundations of their society, Kennedy’s death at 1:44 a.m. Pacific time on June 6, 25 hours after he was shot, was one of the biggest inflection points. Sirhan Sirhan’s bullets not only demolished the hope for a savior candidate who would unite a party so fractured that its incumbent, President Lyndon B. Johnson, had decided not to seek re-election. Coming just two months after the assassination of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., they also fueled a general sense — not entirely unfamiliar today — that the nation had gone mad; that the normal rules and constants of politics could no longer be counted on.
