Patriarchy is the answer✌
: One's decision to call someone engaged in guerrilla warfare a terrorist rather than a freedom fighter depends on one's view of the cause they’re fighting for. In the context of social psychology, this statement indicates that our values can influence our social psychology but they do influence our social beliefs and even our everyday language as well.
: According to researchers the definition of terrorist can’t be same for every individual as because one man’s terrorist can be a freedom fighter for another one. So it is very important that the definition of terrorism must be dependent on the international laws which is acceptable globally. This gives an idea of kinds of activities and attacks that are permitted between two nations. The rule also sets the limits for the nations even at time of the war and bind them to do not disobey and cause terrorism.
These rules and principles are also applicable when there is a fight between Non governmental and governmental organization, but this time these are extended so that none of them can cause terrorist for the another one. Also none of them can target the civilians, so the one who targets civilians with the intention of killing is a terrorist. This definition can differentiate between freedom fighter/soldier and terrorist.
Soap box moment
Defund the police.
The entire movement to defund the police is based on bad terminology. Most people really want to restructure. However when conservatives hear the phrase “defund“ they assume that they want to take all the money away from the police departments.
This specific social issue would be a reform. There needs to be a change in not only how police departments operate, but how people perceive them.
This would need to be addressed on multiple levels. Police receives grants locally, and nationally. Funds will need to be set aside for mental health and grief counseling to provide community support. In order to do this, there does need to be a restructure and reevaluation of how monies are spent.
The goal of this movement would be to provide the police the tools they need to help the community, not just police the community. Many police officers respond to calls that are not legal issues. There is nothing they can do for them except for refer them to another agency. There needs to be an intermediary that helps that family get the help they need. As an example:Mental health. If there is a mental health card, and the person is lucid enough to not be forcibly transported by medics, there needs to be a program that can help these families get that help they need. The same thing with drug addiction, and really teenagers, even issues and financial strain due to unemployment.
Officers are there to enforce the law, not be counselors.
i belive the answer to be slavery
The answer is certainly A.