The width used for the car spaces are taken as a multiples of the width of
the compact car spaces.
Correct response:
- The store owners are incorrect
<h3 /><h3>Methods used to obtain the above response</h3>
Let <em>x</em><em> </em>represent the width of the cars parked compact, and let a·x represent the width of cars parked in full size spaces.
We have;
Initial space occupied = 10·x + 12·(a·x) = x·(10 + 12·a)
New space design = 16·x + 9×(a·x) = x·(16 + 9·a)
When the dimensions of the initial and new arrangement are equal, we have;
10 + 12·a = 16 + 9·a
12·a - 9·a = 16 - 10 = 6
3·a = 6
a = 6 ÷ 3 = 2
a = 2
Whereby the factor <em>a</em> < 2, such that the width of the full size space is less than twice the width of the compact spaces, by testing, we have;
10 + 12·a < 16 + 9·a
Which gives;
x·(10 + 12·a) < x·(16 + 9·a)
Therefore;
The initial total car park space is less than the space required for 16
compact spaces and 9 full size spaces, therefore; the store owners are
incorrect.
Learn more about writing expressions here:
brainly.com/question/551090
<span>See examples for the method to solving literal equations for a given variable: Solve A = bh for b. Since h is multiplied times b, you must divide both sides by h in order to isolate b. Since (c+d) is divided by 2, you must first multiply both sides of the equation by 2</span>
Answer:
Hi There!
Step-by-step explanation:
Your Answers Are:
<h3>1: 19.3 CM</h3><h3>2: 273 CM</h3><h3>3: about 45-65 degrees</h3><h3>4: 15 CM</h3><h3>5: 25 CM</h3><h3 /><h3 />
Its hard to work w/o a ruler or a protractor, so these might be incorrect.
If this helps, though, please give me a thanks!! ^^
- abakugosimp
Answer:
The answer is C (46)
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the measurement of the triangle is 180 then you must subtract 180 by 88 to create 92 and divided that 92 by 2 to get 46.
