Answer:
56% ≤ p ≤ 70%
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the following :
Predicted % of votes to win for candidate A= 63%
Margin of Error in prediction = ±7%
Which inequality represents the predicted possible percent of votes, x, for candidate A?
Let the interval = p
Hence,
|p - prediction| = margin of error
|p - 63%| = ±7%
Hence,
Upper boundary : p = +7% + 63% = 70%
Lower boundary : p = - 7% + 63% = 56%
Hence,
Lower boundary ≤ p ≤ upper boundary
56% ≤ p ≤ 70%
Answer:
well first of all whoever is eating that finna get high levels of cholesterol also you have 2500000 pounds of MAC and cheese and chicken nuggets all together
<u>4h + 7 = 4h - 3</u>
Subtract 4h from each side: 7 = -3
There is no value of ' h ' that can make this a true statement,
so the equation has no solution.
Answer:
4:5
Step-by-step explanation:
I don't see the table but since it is 4 out of every 5 stickers are purple, the ratio would be 4:5, 4/5, or 4 to 5. It doesn't really matter, because all of these mean the same thing.
Tell me if I'm wrong :)
Notice how points T and Z are vertically aligned, or vertically lined up. This is where the graph fails the vertical line test.
The input x = 2 leads to the outputs y = 3 and y = 5 (which are the y coordinates of points Z and T in that order).
A function is only possible when any given input leads to <u>exactly one</u> output only. It would be like saying "the conversion function from Celsius to Fahrenheit has 0 degrees C convert to both 32 degrees F and 50 degrees F at the same time". But such a statement makes no sense and it's not useful. So this is one example of why having one output makes sense for a function.
In short, we need one output for any given input. But the input x = 2 leads to more than one output. That's why we don't have a function.
