Simplify 7 sqare root 3 takeaway 2 sqare root 3 add sqaure root 3 takeaway 3 sqaure root 3
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer: The quantity of the water received by each student = 3.75 liters.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: Total water = 18.75 liters
Total students =5
If each student in the group used the same amount of water for their experiment, then the quantity of the water received by each student =
The quantity of the water received by each student = 3.75 liters.