Claim: Is Reagan's claim, or position, about the space program credible and supported by logical reasoning and evidence? Reasoni
ng: Upon what premises—statements affirming or denying something— is President Reagan's argument based? Does he make any logical errors in presenting his conclusions? For example, does he make any generalizations that are too broad? Evidence: Are the facts, examples, and other details included in the speech valid, authoritative, relevant, and sufficient? Is President Reagan able to support his vision of the future with evidence?
Explanation: Reagan's premise was that even tho we have been doing 25 years of exploration we have still just begun to understand the complex challenges that come with said voyage, this being part of the deaths that took place was considered "all part of taking a chance and expanding man’s horizons.
Numbers helps us to identify what comes first in what order, for example when reading a book. It also allows you to be able to identify money, for example a $100 note is more than a $1 note
I think it is not ethical. The best explanation for this is the addiction, and lust people have for both. Children will grow to notice their parents consuming these products, and they will follow in their parents footsteps.
