Claim: Is Reagan's claim, or position, about the space program credible and supported by logical reasoning and evidence? Reasoni
ng: Upon what premises—statements affirming or denying something— is President Reagan's argument based? Does he make any logical errors in presenting his conclusions? For example, does he make any generalizations that are too broad? Evidence: Are the facts, examples, and other details included in the speech valid, authoritative, relevant, and sufficient? Is President Reagan able to support his vision of the future with evidence?
Explanation: Reagan's premise was that even tho we have been doing 25 years of exploration we have still just begun to understand the complex challenges that come with said voyage, this being part of the deaths that took place was considered "all part of taking a chance and expanding man’s horizons.
He brings the lighting Bolt back to Mount Olympus and hands it to Zeus and proves himself as a hero because he didn't steel the lighting Bolt as he was acused of.
