Question

The case of Furman v. Georgia (1972) resulted in a reinterpretation of the meaning of

Answer 1

1. I believe the answer is: D.cruel and unusual punishment.

Fur,man v. Georgia (1972) revolved around the decision on which type of crimes is considered severe enough to be punishable by death penalty and the method that can be used for the death penalty. The court ruled out that rappist cannot be subjected to death penalty and death by lightning can no longer be used.

2. I believe the answer is: D.create clear standards to be applied fairly before imposing the death penalty.

The court ruled out that even if there might be some crime that could be punishable by death penalty, the process had to carried out as painless as possible. This limit the type of method that can used for the punishment and additional special treatment that death convict has before their punishment.

Answer 2

(1) In 1972, The case of Fur-man v. Georgia resulted in a reinterpretation of the purpose of cruel and uncommon discipline.

The Court relinquished a 5-4 verdict and held out in its judgment pronounced that a death punishment being commanded in the circumstances would disrupt the Constitution as they were unusual and ruthless penalties.

(2) The impact of Fur-man v. Georgia (1972) was that states had to create clear standards to be applied fairly before imposing the death penalty.

The case concluded in a re-interpretation of the definition of severe and significant penalty. The verdict was delivered for a qualification to be executed on the persistence of the death punishment in the United States.  

Further Explanation:

(1) A majority consensus was not communicated forming justification. The tribunal nevermore established any judgment and no plurality was accomplished with none of the five magistrates making the majority concurred with the sentiment manifested by the other. There was a judgment of matter represented by the Magistrates Douglas, White, and Stewart with regards the possible subjectivity encompassed the impressive of the death penalties under subsisting laws.

(2) In the following case the Supreme Court ordered that the death punishment practices were undemocratic destruction of the Eighth Amendment’s interdiction on harsh and extreme penalties. The Court regarded that there were no reasonable, scientific criteria about the death sentence. Magistrate Potter Stewart explained the death sentence arrangement at the time as “outrageous and unusual ”. Additionally, in the words of judges, it was not the death punishment itself that was undemocratic, but moderately, the random approach it was implemented delivered it unnatural and harsh.

Learn more:

1. How did roman authorities treat conquered peoples? brainly.com/question/1974680

2. The 1930s dust bowl in the great plains was caused by? brainly.com/question/1386144

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: NA

Keywords:

Supreme court , Amendment , cruel , harsh , unnatural , Fur-man , Georgia, magistrate , undemocratic, destruction , implemented , subjectivity , scientific.