All categories

3 years ago

The case of Furman v. Georgia (1972) resulted in a reinterpretation of the meaning of

History

2 answers:

storchak [24]3 years ago

6 0

1. I believe the answer is: D.cruel and unusual punishment.

Fur,man v. Georgia (1972) revolved around the decision on which type of crimes is considered severe enough to be punishable by death penalty and the method that can be used for the death penalty. The court ruled out that rappist cannot be subjected to death penalty and death by lightning can no longer be used.

2. I believe the answer is: D.create clear standards to be applied fairly before imposing the death penalty.

The court ruled out that even if there might be some crime that could be punishable by death penalty, the process had to carried out as painless as possible. This limit the type of method that can used for the punishment and additional special treatment that death convict has before their punishment.

GalinKa [24]3 years ago

5 0

(1) In 1972, The case of Fur-man v. Georgia resulted in a reinterpretation of the purpose of cruel and uncommon discipline.

The Court relinquished a 5-4 verdict and held out in its judgment pronounced that a death punishment being commanded in the circumstances would disrupt the Constitution as they were unusual and ruthless penalties.

(2) The impact of Fur-man v. Georgia (1972) was that states had to create clear standards to be applied fairly before imposing the death penalty.

The case concluded in a re-interpretation of the definition of severe and significant penalty. The verdict was delivered for a qualification to be executed on the persistence of the death punishment in the United States.

Further Explanation:

(1) A majority consensus was not communicated forming justification. The tribunal nevermore established any judgment and no plurality was accomplished with none of the five magistrates making the majority concurred with the sentiment manifested by the other. There was a judgment of matter represented by the Magistrates Douglas, White, and Stewart with regards the possible subjectivity encompassed the impressive of the death penalties under subsisting laws.

(2) In the following case the Supreme Court ordered that the death punishment practices were undemocratic destruction of the Eighth Amendment’s interdiction on harsh and extreme penalties. The Court regarded that there were no reasonable, scientific criteria about the death sentence. Magistrate Potter Stewart explained the death sentence arrangement at the time as “outrageous and unusual ”. Additionally, in the words of judges, it was not the death punishment itself that was undemocratic, but moderately, the random approach it was implemented delivered it unnatural and harsh.

Learn more:

1. How did roman authorities treat conquered peoples? brainly.com/question/1974680

2. The 1930s dust bowl in the great plains was caused by? brainly.com/question/1386144

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: NA

Keywords:

Supreme court , Amendment , cruel , harsh , unnatural , Fur-man , Georgia, magistrate , undemocratic, destruction , implemented , subjectivity , scientific.

You might be interested in

Why did america want control of the oregon country?

marusya05 [52]

Oregon Country, 1846 Major Land Purchases Treaty of Paris Louisiana Purchase Red River Basin Florida Texas Annexation Oregon Country Mexican Cession Gadsden Purchase Alaska Hawaii States Emerge Expansion Concentration Oregon Country was a portion of land between the Pacific Ocean and the Rocky Mountains in the northwest portion of the present-day United States. In 1818, the United States and Britain agreed to a "joint occupation" of Oregon, allowing citizens of both countries to settle there. Over the next several decades, American and British settlers came to Oregon for different reasons. The British came mostly for the fur trade, while Americans came to be missionaries or to start farms or larger settlements. By the 1840s, Americans outnumbered their British compatriots, and the fur trade was no longer as lucrative as it had once been. American expansionists — among them President James Polk — were increasingly looking to end the joint occupation and claim Oregon for America alone. Finding themselves in a weakened position, the British agreed to negotiate.

Negotiations between the United States and Britain over the Oregon Country began in the summer of 1845. Because any states that would eventually be formed out of the territory would be free states, anti-slavery Northerners were strongly in favor of acquiring as much of the territory as possible. America's first proposal was that the territory be divided roughly in half, with the boundary drawn at the 49th parallel. When the British rejected this offer, expansionist Northerners called for greater American aggression, using the slogan "Fifty-Four Forty or Fight!" ("Fifty-four Forty" referred to the latitude line marking the northernmost boundary of the territory.) Pro-slavery Southern Congressmen, however, made it clear that they would not support a war with Britain over the territory.

Britain did not want to go to war over the issue either, and in 1846, the two countries reached an agreement to divide the territory at the 49th parallel. Oregon Country would later become the modern-day states of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho, as well as portions of Montana and Wyoming.

3 0

3 years ago

How was judaism religion/belief system utilized to assert political authority and/or reinforce social hierarchies?

mixas84 [53]

The way that Judaism was used to assert political authority and/or reinforce social hierarchies was by intermingling the roles of religious leaders with political authority.

<h3>How was Judaism used to control politics?</h3>

Judaism was not just a belief system for the Jews that guided their religious life, it also guided their political life.

This is because the religious leaders in Judaism also had political authority. For instance, the King or Judge was someone who was appointed by God and so could speak to God.

This led to political authority being asserted with greater ease, and for social hierarchy to be maintained.

Find out more on Judaism at brainly.com/question/729391

#SPJ1

7 0

1 year ago

A native-born American citizen can lose citizenship by

erastova [34]

Answer:

By leaving The US to live in another country or a federal Crime.

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

During which period in United States history, were amendments concerning income tax, direct election of senators, Prohibition, a

Lana71 [14]

Answer:

Progressive era

Explanation:

Hope it helps! My teacher helped me with this!

5 0

2 years ago

What challenges people from different cultures faced as they settle the west in the 1800s and what solutions were created to att

expeople1 [14]

Answer:lack of communication because of distances between properties.

Lack of communication between settlements because of nationalities and non speaking English americans

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago