<span>The probability of incurring bankruptcy increases as a firm's debt/equity ratio decreases.
FALSE</span>
<span>The nash</span> equilibrium would be A. <span> bp and the mini-mart will both not advertise.
The nash equilibrium happens when all of the competitors choose the decision that give the optimal outcome for both of them.
If Bp and mini-mart both choose not to advertise they both will have a similar profit.</span>
Answer:
A Subjective performance evaluation is more feasible when evaluating jobs that cannot easily be evaluated by numbers, in finding problems such as ethical errors that objective evaluation cannot identify and in identifying the rate of achievement of work goals that cannot be recorded in an objective evaluation.
Explanation:
Though Objective evaluation has been the more favored form of evaluation for valid reasons, there are still situations where subjective performance evaluation does a better job in the workplace.
Some jobs for example, the job of an attorney, cannot easily be objectively evaluated. In this situation, it falls on the employer to evaluate the performance of the employee by using measurements like team play, professionalism and client service.
In objective analysis, some ethical approaches are overlooked and the achievement of the set goal is the major criterion for ratings. This affords employees the opportunity to use unethical means to achieve set targets and the objective performance evaluation skips it, leaving them safe and with high ratings. In subjective performance ratings however, the employer having the power to rate employers, could expose these unethical behaviors faster and actions, taken on them.
In the workplace, certain goals are set in overall goals, as a method to achieving the overall set target. In an objective performance rating, an employee could bypass these and still appear to have achieved the overall goal. An objective evaluation will miss this but a subjective evaluation could pick this out and make rating each employee based on these soft goals and overall goal achievable.
Answer:
A monopsony is market where there is only one buyer, e.g. the government is the sole buyer for nuclear submarines in the US.
The demand curve of a monopsony is similar to the demand curve of any other type of market, i.e. it is downward sloping. Since there is only 1 buyer, the demand curve is also the supply curve. If the monopsonist wants to increase the quantity demanded at a lower price, the supplier (or suppliers) must be able to lower its costs and that generally results in lower labor costs.
The result of this mistake on the order form is that Khan's Crickets should verify from Camille the actual order amount intended.
We may factor in the fact that the number of crickets will show the correct quantity that Camille requires, then Khan should supply only the quantity on the order form and request for a corrected or revised order form from Camille.
Thus, the result is that Khan's Crickets will still supply crickets with an invoice worth $1,000, not adhering to the mistaken total sum.
Related link for similar mistake on order form at brainly.com/question/17251413
