1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
umka21 [38]
3 years ago
9

Do you agree or disagree with Beckers idea that economics guides even life’s most personal decisions? Support your position with

two or three examples of your own. Help me please to anyone that knows economics (Becker article )
History
1 answer:
inna [77]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

i agree

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How would a Muscovite asses Atlantas sustainable strategies
s344n2d4d5 [400]

Answer:

shoots are most pronounced where the muscovite is green or yellowish ... heavy demands for so-called "strategic" mica,

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Which selection from the article BEST helps you understand that leaders in the Revolutionary War valued Paine's work?
Triss [41]

The selection from the article BEST helps you understand that leaders in the Revolutionary War valued Paine's work was that  C.) In Philadelphia, Paine finally found a successful career. Many Americans thought the colonies should break away from England.

<h3>How did Thomas Paine influence the American Revolution?</h3>

Paine  was known to have written a 47-page pamphlet that was said to have taken colonial America by storm in the year 1776 and made a lot of vital arguments for declaring independence from the hands of the England.

Hence, The selection from the article BEST helps you understand that leaders in the Revolutionary War valued Paine's work was that  C.) In Philadelphia, Paine finally found a successful career. Many Americans thought the colonies should break away from England.

Learn more about Revolutionary War   from

brainly.com/question/18317211

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
The Supreme Court justices are more willing to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional than to strike down presidential action
stealth61 [152]
Laws passed through congress have a direct impact on the court system, since it changes the way courts have to rule on the law. The Supreme court allows the court system to have some say in what laws are just by appealing their agreement with the constitution. The President doesn't directly pass laws, he has the power to veto congressional laws and through his endorsement behind them, but doesn't actually have the power to write, create or pass new laws himself, even if he's the one who technically signs them into law. As such, the supreme court checks the president less often than congress, because the president's actions affect the court's sphere of interest less often. Most interaction between the president and the court happen when the President heavily endorses a bill, gets it passed through congress, and then the court checks it. Some great examples are the Agricultural Adjustment Administration and the National Recovery Administration, which were created through bills sponsored by Franklin Roosevelt as part of his New Deal reforms. The court struck them down as unconstitutional for various reasons, much to the dismay of FDR. In modern times, Obamacare almost had it's individual mandate requirement stuck down by the court a few years ago and elements of President Trump's muslim travel ban were struck down by the supreme court just in the last month.
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best describes the effect of the French and Indian War on the French in North America
lidiya [134]

Answer:A.

Explanation:The French and Indian War also had lasting (and devastating) effects for the Native American tribes of North America. The British took retribution against Native American nations that fought on the side of the French by cutting off their supplies and then forcibly compelling the tribes to obey the rules of the new mother country.

8 0
3 years ago
As a result of the Adams-Onís <br> Treay,
s344n2d4d5 [400]

The de facto control of West Florida, which had been in American hands since Andrew Jackson had established the American presence in 1818, was recognized, and

a firm delineation of the border between the Louisiana Purchase and the remaining Spanish claims in North America was settled, beginning with the Sabine River between Texas and Louisiana.

The United States assumed the claims of its citizens against Spain, up to $5 million, and Pinckney's Treaty of 1795 was continued to the extent that it did not conflict.

The Spanish were not pleased with the treaty and delayed ratification while hoping to gain support from fellow European powers. None was forthcoming and after King Ferdinand was reduced to a constitutional monarch in 1820, Spain approved the treaty.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Process for a state or group of states to leave the united states?
    8·1 answer
  • The Gulf of Tonkin Incident led to Congress giving approval and funding for what?
    10·1 answer
  • 5. Madison says that factions are part of human nature, why is that?
    5·1 answer
  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of agriculture?
    10·1 answer
  • In Contrast to most European countries, the United States government
    13·1 answer
  • When modernization comes in conflict with traditional values?
    7·1 answer
  • Federal<br> Was the act of establishing the Constitution a national or federal act? Why?
    13·1 answer
  • Which power is not given solely to the president by the Constitution?
    10·2 answers
  • Why would existing alliances cause a country to get involved in conflicts that they otherwise might not participate in?
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!!
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!