There is no congruence between the triangles based on the given information. In general, two sides and an angle not between them are insufficient to specify the triangle completely. In this case, the angles that are congruent are adjacent to non-corresponding sides, so even if SSA correspondence were sufficient to ensure congruence, it would not be sufficient in this case.
The appropriate choice is
... none
Ooo I don’t speak that language
Answer:
I GOT -42 SO LIKE 4 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
Plug in and see.
Check A: Lets plug in (0,3) into y<2/3 x+2.
3<2/3 (0)+2
3<2 is not true so not A
Check C: Lets plug in (3,5) into y<2/3 x+2.
5<2/3 (3)+2
5<2+2
5<4 is not true so not C
Check B: Lets plug in (-3,1) into y<2/3 x+2.
1<2/3 (-3)+2
1<0 is not true so not B
Check D: Lets plug in (1,2) into y<2/3 x+2.
2<2/3 (1)+2
2<2/3+2 is true so D
The missing values are (-6, -9) ( The last option)
Explanation:
x= - 6 has already produced the value of y as 5, the only pair in the given option the make the given ordered pairs NOT to be a function is (-6, -9) since it will give the value of y to be - 9.
