Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Training and development describes the formal, ongoing effort that are made within organizations to improve the performance and self-fulfillment of their employees through a variety of educational methods and programs.
In order to choose the best training method, there are some factors that a company should consider. These factors include:
Number of people to be trained: people can learn more effectively in small groups, and, consequently, less effective in larger ones.
The cost of training: training budget is very essential in the decision process because training can take a lot of resources: money, materials, equipments e.t.c)
The objectives of training: the goal or objectives will vary depending on the organization and the kind of activities the organization plans to do during work.
Therefore, it is TRUE that to choose the best training method, a company should consider such factors as the number of people to be trained, the cost of training, and the objectives of the training.
Answer:
yes because on day u might need help and they are gonna help you back go good job
Explanation:
Answer:
b. Horizontal merger.
Explanation:
Project Repat is merging with a company that produces similar products to its own markets them in similar markets as well, this is an example of a horizontal merger that results in increased synergies between the similar firms and a greater market share opportunity.
Vertical mergers are usually not in the same industry. They would either be with the suppliers of Project Repat or customers who retail Project Repat's products.
Conglomerate is an example of diversification and usually the merging firms have different operations.
There are no information of clashes of any sort within the two merging companies so it is uncertain whether this is a hostile takeover.
Hope that helps.
Answer:
P V = 1669,5
Explanation:
After seven years, future payment will be 9800$ and from there on we will have 23 annual payments more:
P V = 9800/(1+0.08)^23 = 9800/5,87 = 1669,5
Answer:
3.46 m/s
Explanation:
This is actually a Physics question and not a Business question.
According to the property of conservation of momentum, the speed of the Mazda before the collision multiplied by the mass of the Mazda must equal the speed after the collision multiplied by the mass of both cars:
The post-collision speed of the two entangled cars is 3.46 m/s.
