The graph is attached.
We first graph the point where his catch reached the surface, (35, 0). Since it travels upward at a constant rate, the graph will be linear. We also need to know where it starts (what depth it is at when he begins reeling it in). We can use the formula d=rt as a template for our function. d would be distance (in our case, depth), r is the rate (speed) and t is the amount of time.
To find how far the catch had to travel to reach the surface, we set up our equation as:
d = 0.1(35)
This will tell us how much distance it traveled in 35 seconds. 0.1(35)=3.5, so the catch started 3.5m under water. It then travels up at 0.1 m per second.
Answer:
Yes it would
Step-by-step explanation:
Lanie's room is in the shape of a parallelogram.
Lanie has a rectangular rug that is 6 feet wide and 10 feet long.
Area of a rectangle = Length × Width
Area of the rectangular rug = 10 feet × 6 feet
= 60 square feet
We are told that:
The floor of her room is shown below and has an area of 108 square feet.
Hence, the rug would fit on the floor of her room because it's area is within the area of the floor of her room.
Using the confidence interval, it is found that the correct option is:
There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.
<h3>When does a confidence interval for the difference of proportions gives convincing evidence that there is a difference?</h3>
It gives convincing evidence when 0 is not part of the confidence interval.
In this problem, the interval is (0.02, 0.38), which does not contain 0, hence the correct option is:
There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.
More can be learned about confidence intervals at brainly.com/question/25890103
Because the ratio is 1 to 3. It means that For every one apple there are 3 oranges. So If there are 2 apples, there would n 6 oranges. If there are twelve apples, there would be 36 oranges. To find the number of oranges for the amount of apples, just multiply the number of apples by 3.