Just make the equations equal to each other. -0.5x+5=3x-2. Solve for x and find that it is 2, via simple algebra. Since you know x is 2, sub it in in either equation to find y. y should be 4. So the point that fits both equation is (2,4). This shows that the two graphs of these lines will intersect at this exact point.
If you were to graph these two lines, you ould see that the point of intersection is at (2,4) like we solved for.
Answer:
We don't have sufficient evidence to support the claim
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis:
Alternate hypothesis:
The P-value is 0.3064
0.3064 probability of finding a sample proportion lower than the one found.
The p-value is higher than the significance level of 0.05, which means that there is no sufficient evidence to support the claim.
Answer:
Alberta's total overtime pay of the week was $ 145.80.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that Alberta worked 6 hours at time-and-a-half pay, and 3 hours at double-time pay, and that the value of her regular work hour is $ 9.72, to determine the value of the pay of his overtime, the following equation must be performed:
6x1.5x9.72 + 3x2x9.72 = X
9x9.72 + 6x9.72 = X
87.48 + 58.32 = X
145.8 = X
Therefore, Alberta's total overtime pay of the week was $ 145.80.
I so understand that doesn't mean I so
I THINK the answer is 6000 square feet because each one is 6 square feet and you have 1000 of them so 6 square feet times 1000 squares is 6000 square feet.