Answer:
The answer for this problem is
C) y = -x + 6
Step-by-step explanation:
I know this because I just did the test
Answer:
Graph D
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
8
Step-by-step explanation:
8 - 11 = -3 :)
Answer:
The probability that a product is defective is 0.2733.
Step-by-step explanation:
A product consists of 3 parts. If any one of the part is defective the whole product is considered as defective.
The probability of the 3 parts being defective are:
P (Part 1 is defective) = 0.05
P (part 2 is defective) = 0.10 P (part 3 is defective) = 0.15
Compute the probability that a product is defective as follows:
P (Defective product) = 1 - P (non-defective product)
= 1 - P (None of the 3 parts are defective)
= 1 - P (Part 1 not defective) × P (Part 2 not defective) × P (Part 1 not defective)
![=1-[(1-0.05)\times(1-0.10)\times (1-0.15)]\\=1-[0.95\times0.90\times0.85]\\=1-0.72675\\=0.27325\\\approx0.2733](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D1-%5B%281-0.05%29%5Ctimes%281-0.10%29%5Ctimes%20%281-0.15%29%5D%5C%5C%3D1-%5B0.95%5Ctimes0.90%5Ctimes0.85%5D%5C%5C%3D1-0.72675%5C%5C%3D0.27325%5C%5C%5Capprox0.2733)
Thus, the probability that a product is defective is 0.2733.
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis: The department has determined that there should be 40% A’s given, 40% B’s given and 20% C’s given as final grades for the course
If the p-value for this hypothesis test is = 0.000... and this number is lower than the 0.05 significance level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that from the result of our observation that final grades do not match this grading guidelines.
It means the grading guidelines was exceeded in terms of As, was less in terms of Bs and was higher in terms of Cs i e the grading guidelines was not consistent with what was stated in the null.
