Answer:
Explanation:
In dealing with matters relating to the prosecution and progress of a war, we must accord [give] great
respect …to the judgments of the military authorities who are on the scene and who have full
knowledge of the military facts…
At the same time, however, it is essential that there be definite limits to military discretion, especially
where martial law has not been declared. Individuals must not be left impoverished of [without] their
constitutional rights on a plea of military necessity that has neither substance nor support…
…Being an obvious racial discrimination, the order deprives all those within its scope [Japanese
Americans] of the equal protection of the laws as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment. It further
deprives these individuals of their constitutional rights to live and work where they will, to establish a
home where they choose and to move about freely. …this order also deprives them of all their
constitutional rights to procedural due process. Yet no reasonable relation to an "immediate,
imminent, and impending" public danger is evident to support this racial restriction which is one of
the most sweeping and complete deprivations of constitutional rights in the history of this nation in
the absence of martial law.
… there were some disloyal persons of Japanese descent on the Pacific Coast... Similar disloyal
activities have been engaged in by many persons of German, Italian and even more pioneer stock
[people whose ancestors came long ago] in our country. But [the conclusion] that examples of
individual disloyalty prove group disloyalty ...has been used in support of the abhorrent and
despicable treatment of minority groups by the dictatorial tyrannies which this nation is now pledged
to destroy.