This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read:
A Mom Sues Nutella Maker For Deceptive Advertising
By Whitney Blair Wyckoff
Which statement is not Whitney Blair Wycoff's point of view about suing
Nutella in her article?
O A) Nutella is not a nutritional substitute.
B) We want to hold foodmakers accountable.
C) How could something that tastes so good be healthy?
O D) How could a mom mistake Nutella for health food?
Answer:
C) How could something that tastes so good be healthy?
Explanation:
Wyckoff´s remark about how something that tastes so good could be healthy is only a rhetorical question aimed to emphasize how ridiculous it was for her to believe that Nutella was a healthy snack, not her point of view on the topic.
She does claim that Nutella is not a nutritional substitute, and she does mention the objective of holding food makers accountable which can be understood as a kind of support for that idea. And she also questions Athena Hohenberg for mistaking Nutella for healthy food.
The fifth amendment
example: “I PLEAD THE 5TH!!!!”
Answer:
by hand,
Explanation:
if you could add a picture it would be clearer
Answer:
Thanks to a project called After Dark which uses robots to broadcast gallery tours via a web feed, people from around the world <em>have </em>the opportunity to visit London's Tate Britain art gallery from the comfort of their homes.
