Which achievement was the most important for the Minoans and Phoenicians?

PLEASE HELP FAST!!! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!

weeeeeb [17]

Federal court case that dealt with the formation of a federal bank and a series of individual banks. The case of McCulloch v. Maryland started through a series of important events that involved a number of laws. The following laws will allow you to understand what was going on with the McCulloch v. Maryland case.

In 1816, the United States Congress passed an Act that allowed Federal Banks to be located and to operate within individual states in the U.S. Two years later, in 1816, the state of Maryland passed an Act that placed all banks and financial institutions that operated in the state under the taxation model of Maryland. This law thus made banks and other financial institutions in the state, including all federal banks, to pay Maryland state tax. A year after the passing of this law, McCulloch v. Maryland was heard.

McCulloch v. Maryland: The Case Profile

The case of McCulloch v. Maryland was heard in 1819. The case was tried in the Supreme Court of the United States. Andrew McCulloch was the defendant in McCulloch v. Maryland. McCulloch was the appointed manager of the Federal Bank located in Baltimore, Maryland. McCulloch refused to pay the state tax imposed by Maryland; he believed that federal banks were not subject to state taxation.

In McCulloch v. Maryland, the state was the plaintiff. The state of Maryland believed that the federal bank should pay state taxes because they were operating on their land and using their resources.

McCulloch v. Maryland: The Verdict

The United States Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland ruled in favor of the defendant, Andrew McCulloch. The United States Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland ruled in favor of the defendant because the Necessary and Proper Clause of the United States Constitution stated that the Federal Government was permitted to operate banks within individual states without paying taxes. The decision in McCulloch v. Maryland created a precedent; it led to a number of future decisions involving taxation issues and the federal government.

COMMENTS

2 comments

No related posts.

Share

RELATED ARTICLES

Roper v. Simmons

Thomas Jefferson

20% of HIV-Infected Youth were Unaware of Status

Alabama Forms

Alaska Forms

Arizona Forms

Arkansas Forms

California Forms

Colorado Forms

Connecticut Forms

District Of Columbia Forms

Delaware Forms

Florida Forms

Georgia Forms

Idaho Forms

Hawaii Forms

Illinois Forms

Indiana Forms

Iowa Forms

Kansas Forms

Kentucky Forms

Louisiana Forms

Maine Forms

Maryland Forms

Massachusetts Forms

Michigan Forms

Minnesota Forms

Mississippi Forms

Missouri Forms

Montana Forms

Nebraska Forms

Nevada Forms

New Hampshire Forms

New Jersey Forms

New Mexico Forms

New York Forms

North Carolina Forms

North Dakota Forms

Ohio Forms

Oklahoma Forms

Oregon Forms

Pennsylvania Forms

Rhode Island Forms

South Carolina Forms

South Dakota Forms

Tennessee Forms

Texas Forms

Utah Forms

Vermont Forms

Virginia Forms

Washington Forms

West Virginia Forms

Wisconsin Forms

Wyoming Forms

Alabama Codes & Statutes

Alaska Codes & Statutes

Arizona Codes & Statutes

Arkansas Codes & Statutes

California Codes & Statutes

Connecticut Codes & Statutes

Delaware Codes & Statutes

District of Columbia Codes & Statutes

Florida Codes & Statutes

Georgia Codes & Statutes

Hawaii Codes & Statutes

Idaho Codes & Statutes

Illinois Codes & Statutes

Indiana Codes & Statutes

Iowa Codes & Statutes

Kansas Codes & Statutes

Kentucky Codes & Statutes

Louisiana Codes & Statutes

Maine Codes & Statutes

Maryland Codes & Statutes

Massachusetts Codes & Statutes

Michigan Codes & Statutes

Minnesota Codes & Statutes

Mississippi Codes & Statutes

Missouri Codes & Statutes

Montana Codes & Statutes

Nebraska Codes & Statutes

Nevada Codes & Statutes

New Hampshire Codes & Statutes

New Jersey Codes & Statutes

New Mexico Codes & Statutes

New York Codes & Statutes

North Carolina Codes & Statutes

North Dakota Codes & Statutes

Ohio Codes & Statutes

Oklahoma Codes & Statutes

Oregon Codes & Statutes

Pennsylvania Codes & Statute

3 0

4 years ago

2. PART A: What does "inviolably" mean as it is

Nastasia [14]

C; when possible hope this helps :)

7 0

3 years ago

Do white elephant weigh more than a tiger?

Darya [45]

Yes an elephant weighs more

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why did Europe sell Opium to the Chinese?

kobusy [5.1K]

Explanation:

Opium was first introduced to China by Turkish and Arab traders in the late 6th or early 7th century CE. Taken orally to relieve tension and pain, the drug was used in limited quantities until the 17th century. At that point, the practice of smoking tobacco spread from North America to China, and opium-smoking soon became popular throughout the country. Opium addiction increased, and opium importations grew rapidly during the first century of the Qing dynasty (1644–1911/12). By 1729 it had become such a problem that the Yongzheng emperor (ruled 1722–35) prohibited the sale and smoking of opium. That failed to hamper the trade, and in 1796 the Jiaqing emperor outlawed opium importation and cultivation. Despite such decrees, however, the opium trade continued to flourish.

Early in the 18th century, the Portuguese found that they could import opium from India and sell it in China at a considerable profit. By 1773 the British had discovered the trade, and that year they became the leading suppliers of the Chinese market. The British East India Company established a monopoly on opium cultivation in the Indian province of Bengal, where they developed a method of growing opium poppies cheaply and abundantly. Other Western countries also joined in the trade, including the United States, which dealt in Turkish as well as Indian opium.

Britain and other European countries undertook the opium trade because of their chronic trade imbalance with China. There was tremendous demand in Europe for Chinese tea, silks, and porcelain pottery, but there was correspondingly little demand in China for Europe’s manufactured goods and other trade items. Consequently, Europeans had to pay for Chinese products with gold or silver. The opium trade, which created a steady demand among Chinese addicts for opium imported by the West, solved this chronic trade imbalance.

3 0

3 years ago

What contributed to the unpopularity of President John Quincy Adams?

julia-pushkina [17]

<em>if you are looking for the answer on Edemenunity it is C.
:P</em>

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers