Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Part A:
Mark did not round to the nearest hundreds, he rounded to the nearest tens.
Option A (Incorrect):
271 and 582 are normally not rounded down, unless we are using limits coming from the left and a unique equation.
Option B (Incorrect):
271 as the same problem as option A, but 582 rounding to 600 is correct. It doesn't make sense to round both numbers differently, unless stated.
Option C (Incorrect):
271 rounding to 300 is correct, but 582 is not normally rounded down to 500 unless we are using limits coming from the left and a unique equation. Unless stated, don't round both numbers differently.
Option D (Correct):
271 rounded to 300 and 582 rounded to 600 looks correct for rounding to the hundreds.
Part B:
There are two ways to solve this question:
One way:
271 + 582 = 853
Round 853 to the nearest hundred for 900
(Note: Round 853 to the nearest tens for 850.)
Second way:
271 + 582
Round Numbers:
300 + 600
= 900
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
There are two outcomes for the input of 1 in the value of x, which violates the standards of a function
Given that:
f(1)=13 and 2f(n-1)+(n-2)
then:
f(4) will be found as follows:
f(2)=2f(2-1)=2f(1)=2*13=26
f(3)=2f(3-1)+(3-2)=2f(2)+1=2*26+1=53
f(4)=2f(4-1)+(4-2)=2f(3)+(4-2)=2(53)+2=108
Thus:
Answer:(3) 108
Answer:
Option 4
Step-by-step explanation:
The smaller sides must add up to be greater than the largest side so:
1) 6 + 8 < 15
1) No
2) 6 + 9 = 15
2) No
3) 9 + 6 < 16
3) No
4) 9 + 8 > 16
4) Yes
The answer would be j=-3 If you want me to tell you how I got that answer just let me know :)
