I believe it’s A or B I’m leaning towards A but I’ll look up the definition definition: “intellectual property rights are the rights given to people over the the creations of their minds. They usually give the creator an exclusive right over the use of his/her creation for a certain period of time” so The answer is
ANSWER- B
The United States Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. Carr (1962) held federal courts could review claims that a state's redistricting of electoral lines violates the Equal 14th Amendment Amendment to the Constitution.
About Equal Protection Clause
The United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment's first section contains the Equal Protection Clause. The article states that "neither shall any state deny to any individual within its authority the equal protection of laws." It came into force in 1868. It demands that the law treat people equally who are in similar circumstances. Civil Rights Act of 1866's equality provisions were a major driving force behind the inclusion of this paragraph.
To know more about Baker v. Carr:
brainly.com/question/29398317
#SPJ4
Answer:
B. Espionage.
Explanation: Espionage is thought as a political crime because it represents a challenge against A government, As espionage is the use of spies to obtain Government Information and sometimes Military Information, If the espionage is successful, it can become a large problem for any government because it can give away information that can not and should not be put in foreign/enemy hands or a political oppenents hands.
Answer:
hate crime
Explanation:
I searched it on google I attached a photo
Answer:
The Supremacy Clause is located in Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States. The Supremacy Clause states that the Constitution, any and all treaties made under the powers of the Constitution and/or federal laws, and all laws made by the federal government under the authority of the Constitution are the Supreme Law of the Land. This means that are federal laws as described above are given higher authority and power over any conflicting state law. Any state law that conflicts with federal law will be stuck down as unconstitutional.
Explanation: