I think atoms are made up of three parts
Answer:
In all different levels of the food webs and food chains, it is seen that damaged members of the prey have become easy food for the predators.
Explanation:
Preys can identify the other members of their species are injured or wounded or fed by the predators by their body fluid in as if a predator eats the prey the blood or other body fluid releases. These fluids or blood help individual prey species to be aware of the predator as they recognize that their species member is wounded or consumed by there olfactory receptors.
There are several other chemicals cue that is species specif that are released by the prey to alarm the other species member by injured or dead members.
Thus, the correct answer is - In all different levels of the food webs and food chains it is seen that damaged members of the prey have become easy food for the predators.
Answer:
The correct option is C. Building a well between the two wells that goes deeper into the earth would not stop the water from being polluted .
Explanation:
Even if a well was constructed between the wells B and C, it wouldn't have stopped the contamination of the water. As the oil would still be leaking and it would contaminate the wells.
All of the other options can be used to stop the contamination.
Option A suggests building an impermeable membrane that would stop the oil flow. Hence, the water in the wells will not be contaminated.
Option B suggests not using the water from the wells and using an alternate water supply. The alternate water supply wouldn't be contaminated with oil.
Option D suggests chemically purifying the contaminated water. This can be an effective technique to clean the contaminated water.
A team of scientists has consistently gotten the same unexpected results from a set of experiments. Then "Peer review of the scientific methods and data analysis" may helps the scientists to ensure the reliability of the results.
<u>Answer:</u> Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
The roots of achieving unexpected results lie or depend on scientific methods used and analysis of data performed for acquiring results. Therefore when experiment results into unexpected readings researcher need to give a review of entire method and analysis.
Although rest other points like publication of results, discussing with friends and family members or removal of inconsistent data may or may not help depends upon conditions but reviewing helps as observed in many cases , because one must have performed unintentionally or intentionally an error while going through methods.
<span>peristalsis should be your answer.</span>
