How international affairs should be handled by the president is not the major compromises during the constitution convention included.
Option D
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
There were some important as well as some major compromises that were taken at the time of the constitution convention. These things included how the slaves and servants should be taken into count while estimating the population of a particular country. Also, added to this, how people should represent themselves in the congress should also be calculated.
The only thing that is not taken into consideration is that, how the international policies and affairs should be handled by the president of a country. This does not actually comes under this compromise taken by the government.
The highest elected position in the Roman Republic was "C. Consul," since it was in fact two Consuls that ruled that entire Roman Republic for quite some time.
The British government relaxed rules regulating trade for the American colonies in the late 1600s because the British hoped the colonies would become wealthier and spend more on manufactured goods from Britain.
The ultimate goal of the United States in their intervention in Mexico in 1914 was to have a neighbor that is stable, that they will be able to influence and control to a certain level, and protect their economic and political interest.
The intervention of the United States was a very variable and very controversial. They did not stick with one side to support, but instead they were changing sides, usually supporting the person in power, except when the French intervened too.
Also, the USA openly threatened Mexico that it will use military power in order to protect its interests and its citizens that own businesses and property in the country.