Answer:
1. eleven
2. Missouri
3. Henry Clay
4. maine
5. Missouri Compromise
6. California
7. Texas
8. Wilmot Proviso
9. Mexico
10. John C. Calhoun
11. slavery
12. Free-soil
Explanation:
In 1819, Congressman James Tallmadge, Jr., of New York initiated an uproar in the South when he proposed two amendments to an account admitting Missouri to the Union as a free state. The first banned slaves from moving to Missouri, and the second would free all Missouri slaves born after admission to the Union at the age of 25. With the admission of Alabama as a slave state in 1819, the United States was equally divided with 11 slave states and 11 free states. The admission of the new state of Missouri as a slave state would give the slave a majority in the Senate; the Tallmadge Amendment would give the free states a majority.
The Tallmadge amendments passed the House of Representatives, but failed in the Senate when five Northern Senators voted with all the southern senators. The question was now the admission of Missouri as a slave state, and many leaders shared Thomas Jefferson's fear of a crisis over slavery - a fear that Jefferson described as "a fire bell at night." The crisis was solved by the 1820 Commitment, which admitted Maine to the Union as a free state at the same time that Missouri was admitted as a slave state. The Commitment also prohibited slavery in the Louisiana Purchase territory north and west of the state of Missouri along the 36–30 line. The Missouri Commitment calmed the issue until its limitations of slavery were repealed by the Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854.
In the South, the Missouri crisis aroused old fears again that a strong federal government could be a fatal threat to slavery. The Jeffersonian coalition that united southern planters and northern farmers, mechanics and artisans in opposition to the threat posed by the Federalist Party had begun to dissolve after the war of 1812. Only in the Missouri crisis did the Americans realize of the political possibilities of a sectional attack against slavery, and only in the mass policy of the Jackson Administration this type of organization around this issue became practical.
2. The state tolerated Lutherans but not Calvinists.
Explanation:
- This statement is followed by the decision of the Augsburg Peace Treaty.
- The Peace of Augsburg is an agreement signed by Charles V and the forces of the Protestant Alliance on 25 September 1555 in the city of Augsburg.
- That agreement ended the violence between Lutherans and Catholics in Germany.
- The Peace of Augsburg was moderately successful in solving problems arising in the empire. Tolerance was increased and tension was freed from the empire. Many unresolved issues remain.
- Calvinists were not protected by the agreement, so various Protestant groups lived in Lutheran areas and were in danger of being accused by the Lutheran regional ruler of heresy. Tolerance did not officially exist for the Calvinists until after the Peace of Westphalia in 1648.
Learn more on The Peace of Augsburg on
brainly.com/question/730365
brainly.com/question/8776410
#learnwithBrainly
The larger states have more electoral votes and have a much greater influence. Since they have more electoral votes the it is for them.
Although a totalitarian government is generally considered an unproductive and harmful idea, a totalitarian government would be considered more efficient at making decisions than a democratic one, because a democratic government makes decisions based on the people making the decisions through representation of all the different peoples. A totalitarian government, on the other hand, is a political system in which one person holds total control over the state. This would mean that the person would make all the decisions without needing anyone's consent and this would be more efficient, as decisions would be made quicker.
Hopefully this helps please give me a thanks if you got it right :)
I believe the answer is The Fireside Chats.
