Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
True
Because they spend over 34 billion dollars I pretty sure I looked it up but don’t take me up on it
Answer:
Vandalism
Explanation:
when you damage or destroy someone property
As she is not fully qualified to do that as it hasn't been property diagnosed and recorded
Answer:
reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Explanation:
