1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lynna [10]
2 years ago
6

Mary, Janet and Shantil formed a partnership, Brookdale Senior Care (BSC), to provide temporary housing and general care for eld

erly people in Memphis, Tennessee. One of the temporary residents left the stove on and burned down the house, which resulted in the loss of the entire building and contents. One of the residents, Francine, sued BSC and obtained a judgment of $ 30,000 against it, but the partnership could not pay the judgment
Law
1 answer:
viva [34]2 years ago
6 0

The option that Francine has since the partnership cannot get the 30000 would be to have assets that are worth this amount from the partnership.

<h3>What is a partnership?</h3>

This is the type of business between two or more people were the parties have to share in the risks, the profits and the loss of the business.

Francine can get the assets from BSC given that this is a partnership and other it, all of the partners have the same liability

<h3>Complete question</h3>

Mary, Janet and Shantil formed a partnership, Brookdale Senior Care (BSC), to provide temporary housing and general care for elderly people in Memphis, Tennessee. One of the temporary residents left the stove on and burned down the house, which resulted in the loss of the entire building and contents. One of the residents, Francine, sued BSC and obtained a judgment of $ 30,000 against it, but the partnership could not pay the judgment.

What are Francine’s options if the Brookdale partnership cannot pay the $30,000?

Read more on partnership here:

brainly.com/question/25012970

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the National Federation of State High Scho
GarryVolchara [31]

Answer: No.

Explanation:

The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, later amended by the Clayton Act (1914) prohibits agreements in restraint of trade and monopolization. I expressely outlaws competing firms to conspire to consolidate the market by unfair means, restraining the trade of others.  

In this case, the standards for non-wood bats set by the NCAA and the NFHS are not meant to establish a monopoly and they don´t restrain Marucci´s trade.

8 0
2 years ago
What role do you think an independent judiciary, separate from the legislative and executive
Ivanshal [37]
No political power can supersede it, and the independent judiciary, rather than the elected legislature, serves as its interpreter. Far from a threat to popular will, a separate judicial branch was designed to guarantee democratic freedoms by preventing the concentration of power in government.
3 0
3 years ago
I will give brainliest please help.
MakcuM [25]
Your answer would be C pretty sure.
3 0
2 years ago
Are conservatorships a thing in communist countries?
Troyanec [42]

Answer:

It is slightly a common thing, not completely.

<em>I hope this helped at all.</em>

6 0
2 years ago
In the United States, strong patent and copyright laws prevent rival companies from making imitations or knock-off versions of n
Rasek [7]

Answer:

True, but patents and copyrights only are valid for a certain amount of time. Branding, however, is controlled by trademarks, not copyright/patent.

Explanation:

A patent essentially is a document that describes your unique invention or idea to the government, while ensuring you have exclusive rights to it. In the US, vaccines and laws of nature (which include, but are not limited to mathematical or scientific proofs) are not allowed to be patented. Your idea must also be able to be commercially applied (i.e. you can build something you can sell).

The description includes how you found how to make or produce a product (or how you came to an idea), a description or the product, and a description of how it works.

A patent usually lasts until 20 Years. However, it can become void sooner depending on how important it has become to industry and what kind of product it is.

Copyright is a form of protection by the law that ensures that no one can replicate your ORIGINAL (you do it yourself without the use of already existing works) work without your permission. Your work must be tangible (you can use your 5 senses to know it exists and what it is). This does not protect facts, ideas, or how something is done.

A copyright certificate in the US for a person is valid for their lifetime plus 75 years, and company-owned copyright certificate is valid for 50 years (usually). If certain criteria are met, it is possible to be extended (just don't count on it).

By ensuring that you have exclusive rights to your work through a patent or through copyright, it prevents competition from being able to steal your work (via imitation or bootlegging) of your product. The name and brand however, are protected by a differing mechanism: trademarks (notice the TM and (R) things on brand icons, and on their slogans?).

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In Furman v. Georgia (1972), the Supreme Court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had denied Furman the right
    8·2 answers
  • if you or your friends decide to drink you should answer option plan ahead for a ride, be the one driving, ask your friends to d
    11·2 answers
  • TRUE OR FALSE:Habit and character evidence are both governed by FRE 406
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a new technology that makes correctional<br> institutions safer?
    7·1 answer
  • Will reward for answer
    15·2 answers
  • Please help taking exam right now will give brainless!!!!
    12·2 answers
  • The US Constitution upholds the rights to trademarks and copyrights.<br> True<br> False
    10·1 answer
  • The house agreed to the compromise as soon as the senate approved it
    15·1 answer
  • A tenant signs a lease for less than a year. What is his interest in the property? Joint tenancy Remainder Estate Apartment Esta
    7·1 answer
  • Public figures: Group of answer choices can never have an action in defamation. lose their defamation action rights if the remar
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!