A geologist and a biologist performed an experiment together and examined the data. Each scientist formed a different conclusion
. Both conclusions were supported by the evidence. How is this possible? A.) Both conclusions are the same but have different wording.
B.) If more than one conclusion is supported, the hypothesis is invalid.
C.) There can be alternate explanations for the same evidence.
D.) Each conclusion is based on different data.
The answer is letter C.) <span>There can be alternate explanations for the same evidence.
The results of the two researchers may have been the same, but the interpretation of the data is significantly different. Their conclusions can be </span><span>further </span>supported by gathering more results from different experiments.
<span>Thank you for posting your question. I hope you found what you were after. Please feel free to ask me more</span>
1. for new forms of life 2. to find new inhabitable planets. 1.humans lack the technology to travel. by the time they get to the nearest inhabitable planet it would have been centuries. 2.ships we currently have are not made for far distance travel
