Answer:
It is here where the king makes a connection between the size of Gulliver and other humans and their moral weakness. He Is obviously disgusted at the human thirst for power and at what lengths are we willing to take it:
"The king was struck by horror by the description I had given of those terrible engines, at the proposal I had made. He was amazed how so impotent and groveling an insect as I could entertain such inhuman ideas, and in so familiar a manner as to appear wholly unmoved at all the scenes of blood and desolation, which I had painted as the common effects of those destructive machines."
Explanation:
"Gulliver's Travels", a novel from 1726, is divided in four parts: by Lemuel Gulliver, first a surgeon, and then a captain of several ships by the Irish writer and clergyman Jonathan Swift, a full-length prose satire on both human nature and the "travellers' tales". In this novel the theme is moral correctness vs mental or physical strength, and it as a classic of English literature "to vex the world rather than divert it" turning to an immediate universally read success masterpiece.
Africa abviously.,...................
Answer:
D3.
Explanation:
Situational model or situational leadership model can be described or explained as a leadership model whereby the leaders are able to use or adopt different leadership styles based on the situation or the type of followers they want to influence.
The D3 talks about the capable or cautious performer with variable commitment. This describes the people that are capable to perform a task, but unwilling to do it due to lack of confidence or not motivated to do it well/ quickly.
This statement is true. Interpersonal communication does focus on what happens between people. When you say interpersonal, it pertains to the interaction between yourself and other people. The opposite of this is called intrapersonal - which is the interaction to the inner self.
Answer:
Concurring opinion
Explanation:
In a legal system concurring opinion can be regarded as a written opinion from a judge or more than one judges of a court that also agree with the majority of the court on their decision, even though their is a reason been stated for his/her own decision.
It should be noted that when One or more justices who agree with the majority's conclusions about a case, but do so for different reasons, write a Concurring opinion
