1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
polet [3.4K]
3 years ago
13

Explain 2 major differences between the colonial regions of New England and the Southern Colonies?

History
1 answer:
Nostrana [21]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

New England had craftsmen skilled in shipbuilding. The Mid-Atlantic had a workforce of farmers, fishermen, and merchants. The Southern Colonies were mostly agricultural with few cities and limited schools. New England's economy at first specialized in nautica

You might be interested in
Who founded the Standard Oil Company
musickatia [10]

Answer:

John D. Rockefeller FOUNDED STANDARD OIL COMPANY

IF YOU LIKED MY ANSWER SUBSCRIBE TOY CHANNEL ON YOTUBE LOL GAMING

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is the best description of the Parthenon? a.
kirill [66]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The Parthenon Ancient Greek is a former temple on the Athenian Acropolis, Greece, dedicated to the goddess Athena, whom the people of Athens considered their patron.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
write a essay about what extent did the United States of America was not successful in containing the spread of communism in Vie
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer: The United States was a phenomenal success at containing communism after 1945, as long as one considers success as not falling to communism itself. I maintain, however, that the measure of success we should expect is the quarantine of communism to its’ component initial member, the Soviet Union. But in the years after World War II to the age of the Nixon presidency, the US failed to stop the expansion of communism to any efficiency. The whole of Eastern Europe fell to communism. The most populous nation on Earth, China, also went communist indirectly taking with it N. Korea and Vietnam, and making the countries of Cambodia and Laos quasi-communist. The United States even gained a communist satellite 90 miles out of its’ boundaries, Cuba. It is clear that American foreign policy with its’ banner of containment was a miserable failure. The end of World War II brought the redrawing of boundaries all over the world. Korea, conquered by Japan during the war, was divided at the 38th parallel then given to the USSR in the north and the US in the south. The Soviets pulled out of N. Korea in 1950, leaving a communist regime behind. That regime, funded and equipped by The Peoples Republic of China, invaded S. Korea. The United Nations (led, of course, by the United States) raised an army to restore peace and expel the aggressors. The “conflict” lasted three years and victory changed hands twice before the bloodied United States established a cease-fire zone on the familiar 38th parallel. Some might say that communism in this case was successfully contained, however, the loss of 53,000 American lives in a fruitless attempt to topple a regime is hardly a victory. A similar yet more gruesome failure of the United States would materialize in Vietnam. Vietnam declared independence from France in 1945, which the French did not recognize. A war broke and after 8 years of fighting the decision came in 1954 to split the country in two, North Vietnam being Communist and South Vietnam led by the Vietnamese who supported the French. Diem, the South Vietnamese leader was assassinated in 1963, causing the U.S. to send over American troops to try to support the non-Communist regime in the South, in accordance with the Truman Doctrine. The consequent struggle would prove to be the most agonizing and long defeat of the American military in history. Fighting a traditional war in a guerrilla setting and the insistence that we could win the war without popular support of the South Vietnamese were two key elements of our failure. The United States suffered 68,000 dead along with 400,000 S. Vietnamese allies. It was 1973 when we first started to withdraw our troops, and in 1976, all of Vietnam came under rule by the Communist North. Later, Vietnam would occupy Laos and Cambodia in part of an Asian Soviet bloc.

8 0
3 years ago
Why was Fort Sumter of strategic importance to the North and the South?
Colt1911 [192]
North: They had troops, guns, equipment, and provisions inside, and they owned it, and so they wanted to keep it.
South: It was located in the South, and they thought it was rightfully theirs, and that is why they wanted it

It didn't really have any strategic importance, however, it had political importance


hope this helps
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which section of the U.S. favored strong state rights?
bixtya [17]
I’m not sure when you say U.S. but the Republicans supported the idea of state rights. (If you could clarify you question I could help more).
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Prussian rulers pay for their large standing army?
    14·2 answers
  • In which sentence does the underlined noun clause function as a direct object
    10·1 answer
  • Need 35 through 39 I don't really understand this please help
    10·1 answer
  • In the bible who said what a great Forest is set on fire by a small spark​
    11·2 answers
  • The word botanical means?<br> Like an igloo/ snow<br> Like a storm<br> Plants/Flowers<br> Building
    13·2 answers
  • Anti-trust laws _____________.
    8·1 answer
  • 9. Why did the South feel justified in seceding from the United States?
    7·1 answer
  • Most urban areas in Latin America are overpopulated because _______.
    9·2 answers
  • Which life forms comprises most of an article land animals? A--Polar bears and brown bears. B-huskies and wolves. C-caribou and
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following best characterizes the economic situation of most Asian states such as China at the end of the nineteenth
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!