Answer:
Honestly I never thought about it, but I would go with the hens.
Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
The answer is "Scientific journal".
Answer:
Natural Resources allowed community to thrive.
Explanation:
Natural resources provided the materials for all forms of physical products that is important to build the economy.
When a community possess a certain type of natural resources in their area, the cost of acquiring that natural resources became really cheap. This enable that community to designed their economy specifically to leverage on this advantage.
As a result, this will generate a lot of wealth for the people who are involved in the project. But, the benefit does not stop there. If those wealth are taxed properly, the government could use it to build/develop the infrastructures in the community, This will improve the standard of living of the people who live there.
I believe it is three-fourths, A
