The answer is: Validity
To put it simply, validity refers to whether the study is actually measures the things that the researchers intended to.
Validity in every studies is extremely depended on whether the variables that the researchers use actually have a correlation with the phenomenon they're observing with the study.
In the case above, Valencia wants to measure people's narcissism. Because of this, The questions that she asked to her subject is really correlating with the subject's narcissistic tendencies.
<span>The correctional nurse recognizes that events occurring in the present reality are likely to be incorporated into a flashback, leading the inmate to become more frightened and desperate to escape. Even if no longer experiencing a flashback, persons will likely reexperience their original trauma if restrained, including the emotions experienced during that trauma, leading to increased fearfulness and resistance to the jail restraints. Restraints are not likely to calm the individual or reduce aggressiveness but instead increase the sense of helplessness and desperation.</span>
Hello!
Montesquieu influenced the idea of Separation of Powers, which is currently used in the United States as a form of governmental balance.
The Separation of Powers limits each governmental branch with the purpose of preventing a dictatorship. Currently, the U.S. government is divided into three branches: the Legislative branch (includes the House and the Senate), the Executive branch (the president), and the Judicial branch (the courts). The Separation of Powers works as checks and balances. This means that if one branch gains more power than it should have, the other two branches can prevent it from gaining too much power. Each branch has a specific purpose that it must maintain.
Montesquieu concluded that the best way to prevent government corruption was to productively divide it. This idea was picked up by the United States and is still in effect today.
I hope this helps you!
This is an opinion question, so here is what I would answer with:
The government should not place special taxes on fast food as it is how some people survive. People with low income cannot simply run to the grocery store and get everything to make a burger and fries. They must rely on large fast food chains to give them healthy, enough, food for survival.
OR...
The government should place special taxes on fast food. This would increase the prices on foods sold. This said pricing could detour the public to making healthier, cheaper food choices.
