1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vikki [24]
2 years ago
10

If a firm's marginal tax rate is increased, this would, other things held constant, lower the cost of debt used to calculate its

WACC. True False
Business
1 answer:
enot [183]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The answer is "True".

Explanation:

The marginal rate is indeed the extra income tax about any dollar earned as income. Its annual tax rate is the total tax paid divided by the total earnings. This marginal rate of 10% will impose a tax of 10 cents on every following income spent. that's why the given statement is true because the cost of debt = k\times (1-t)   and its t value will increase the cost of the decrease.

You might be interested in
According to the international financial reporting standards, partnerships must disclose information in the same manner as
katrin [286]
The disclosure should follow the International Financial Reporting Standards.  It should fairly show the presentation, provided that all the necessary documents are submitted to be a statement of financial position. <span>Disclosure in a partnership has to make the same guidelines as the entity requirements.  </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME ASAP PLEASE!!!!
mojhsa [17]

Answer:B

Explanation:

This is because as one's income increases his aggregate demand also increases as they both have direct relationship with each other.

5 0
3 years ago
Garage Specialty Corporation manufactures joint products P and Q. During a recent period, joint costs amounted to $80,000 in the
goblinko [34]

Answer:

Option B,$62,400 is correct

Explanation:

Firstly,we need to determine the sales of each joint product if sold after the split off point as follows:

Sales value of P=20,000*$2.20=$44,000

sales value of Q=60,000*$2.60=$156,000

total sales value                          =$200,000

joint cost is $80,000

joint cost allocated to Q=total joint cost*Q sales value/total sales value

                                        =$80,000*156,000/200,000=$62,400

Out of the $80,000 joint cost incurred by both joint products,Q would be allocated $62,400

7 0
3 years ago
When performing capital budgeting, __________ incurred by a project are irrelevant to future investment decisions.
m_a_m_a [10]

Question:

When performing capital budgeting, __________ incurred by a project are irrelevant to future investment decisions.

A) Opportunity costs

B) Depreciation

C) Sunk costs

D) Taxes

Answer:

The correct answer is C) Sunk Costs      

Explanation:

Capital Budgeting is the art (most applicable to corporate persons) of planning expenditure that will be incurred in the future, especially on long term assets.

The reason you cannot factor Sunk Cost into a Capital Budget is because of  its very nature.

Sunk Costs refer to monies for items that have already been expended and can never be recovered. If it can never be recovered and has <u>already</u>  been incurred, it has no role to play in future considerations especially when the purpose of Capital Budgetting is considered.

The primary purpose of a Capital Budget is that it helps to further evaluate the inflow against the outflow of an investment to check whether or not the return is acceptable.

Every other option given in the question above are items that have futuristic qualities.

Cheers

6 0
3 years ago
If you invest $2,000 today for three years at 5% interest paid annually, you will earn a total of $______ in interest. Assume yo
Usimov [2.4K]

Answer:

Option (C) is correct.

Explanation:

Given that,

Amount invested today = $2,000

Interest paid annually(r) = 5%

Time period(n) = 3 years

Future\ value=Present\ value\times(1+r)^{n}

Future\ value=2,000\times(1+0.05)^{3}

Future\ value=2,000\times(1.05)^{3}

                            = $2,315.25

Therefore,

Total amount earn:

= Future value - Present value

= $2,315.25 - $2,000

= $315.25

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Traditionally, Lamme's Candies have used direct sellers to distribute its products. However, it recently made the decision to al
    13·1 answer
  • In the portfolio matrix, characteristics of goods and services in the leverage quadrant are: Group of answer choices competitive
    5·1 answer
  • Shortly after graduating college, Roberto took his place in his family's company in Miami. Roberto's father and uncle started a
    5·1 answer
  • If people expect the price of packaged coffee to rise next week, coffee demand will:
    15·1 answer
  • The return on the market portfolio is currently​ 12%. Mobile Phone Corporation stockholders require a rate of return of​ 30% and
    13·1 answer
  • Ziegler Company properly applies the lower of cost and net realizable value rule and determines that its inventory value has dec
    8·1 answer
  • The following transactions were completed by the company a. The owner invested $19,000 cash in the company in exchange for its c
    8·1 answer
  • HELP ME ASAPP ! Please don’t guess!
    11·1 answer
  • At Richardson Manufacturing Company, there are two factors that determine the cost of health care. If an employee makes less tha
    9·1 answer
  • How does adaptability assist a school leaver to become a successful business owner
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!