Answer:
d. Matt's statement is positive while Jean's statement is normative
Explanation:
A positive statement can be defined as any statement that is typically based on empirical evidence and as such can be tested, proven and verified. Also, a positive statement can be amended or rejected based on evidences that are available.
On the other hand, a normative statement can be defined as any statement that can't be tested, proven or verified because it is judgmental and based on opinions.
In this scenario, Matt observes that "there is a high correlation between educational attainment and the level of income." Jean concurs and adds that "high school graduates should all proceed to college"
Hence, Matt's statement is positive because it is an observation based on empirical evidence while Jean's statement is normative because it's simply his opinion or a value judgment.
The Federal Reserve System controls the monetary policy in the United States. They influence short-term interest rates and also determine the size of the money supply. The Federal budget is very hard to balance and <span>has been a concern and is difficult to achieve. The President sends the budget to Congress who must approve it.
</span>
<span>1. Practice safe sex: Always make sure to talk about your sexual history with your new sexual partner prior to engaging in sex. If you are non-monogamous, use condoms every time. Encourage your sexual partner to join you in getting an STD test. This is important for short-term and long-term health because it can affect the ability to have children in the long term and also decrease risk for contracting an STD in the short-term.
2. Drink water: Being hydrated is important in the long-term for maintaining a healthy reproductive system. Vaginal dryness can be caused/or worsened by dehydration, which can make sex less comfortable and increase risk of infections.
3. Get annual checkups: this is a long-term benefit. It can help catch any potential problems while they are early to prevent them from becoming much more serious.
4. Be conscious about using toxic chemicals. Another long-term goal is to stay away from ttoxins lie dioxin, phthalates, PFCs, and pesticides. These chemicals can cause reproductive problems that could negatively influence the ability to have a healthy pregnancy.</span>
Answer:
hedonic Theory of Wages:
Accept just two kinds of occupations in the work showcase (safe employments versus unsafe occupations). Under this, sheltered employments have likelihood of zero that specialist gets harmed. Unsafe occupations have likelihood of 1 and laborers know this. Laborers care about whether their occupations are sheltered or hazardous.
Laborers expand utility by picking wage-chance blends that offer them the best measure of utility. Expect laborers disdain hazard, yet to various degrees, for example they have diverse ideal pay chance blends. Firms are on their isoprofit bends that give the hazard wage mixes that give zero (financial) benefit. They vary between firms. An indulgent pay work mirror the connection among wages and occupation qualities. It matches laborers with various hazard inclinations with firms that can give employments that coordinate these diverse hazard inclinations.
Apathy bends uncover the exchange offs that a laborer favors among wages and level of hazard (chance thought to be an 'awful'). To give a similar utility, dangerous occupations must compensation higher wages than safe employments. The more prominent the laborer's aversion for hazard, the more prominent the pay off required for changing from a safe to an unsafe activity, and the more noteworthy the booking cost. As the pay firms bring to the table for hazardous occupations increments, less firms will extend to dangerous employment opportunities and bringing about a descending slanting interest bend as it turns out to be increasingly productive for firms to make occupations spare than to pay the higher compensation.
Suppositions of Differential Wage Theory are:
- The compensation differential is sure. Hazardous employments pay more than spare occupations.
- The balance wage differential is that of the last laborer employed (the peripheral specialist). It's anything but a proportion of the normal abhorrence for chance among laborers in the work showcase.
- Along these lines, everything except the minimal specialist are overcompensated by the market.
On the off chance that a few specialists like to work in dangerous occupations (they are eager to pay for the option to be harmed) and if the interest for such laborers is little, the market repaying differential is negative. At point P, where supply rises to request, laborers utilized in unsafe occupations acquire not as much as laborers utilized in safe employments. The outline given beneath shows the circumstance:
Isoprofit Curve:
As it is exorbitant to create well-being, a firm contribution hazard level P* can make the working environment more secure for example move left on flat pivot, just on the off chance that it diminishes compensation while keeping benefits consistent, so that the iso-benefit bend is upward slanting. Higher isoprofit bend returns lower benefit.
Answer:
The first journal entry was not the most appropriate, but since the mistake was correctly adjusted at the end of the year, both assets and expenses will be the same whether they did it correctly the first time or they had to adjust a mistake at the end of the year.
E.g. something like this happened
October 1, rent expense for 1 year
Dr Rent expense 12,000
Cr Cash 12,000
December 31, adjustment to rent expense
Dr Prepaid rent 10,000
Cr Rent expense 10,000
they should have recorded it as:
October 1, prepaid rent for 1 year
Dr Prepaid rent 12,000
Cr Cash 12,000
December 31, adjustment to rent expense
Dr Rent expense 2,000
Cr Prepaid rent 2,000
Whichever way you recorded the transactions, the balances a the end of the year would be:
prepaid rent (asset) $10,000
rent expense (expense) $2,000