Answer:
11.63 million dollar
Explanation:
In 2005 the construction cost index was 1746 , in 2015 , it was 3260.
change in index in 10 years = 3260-1746 = 1514
change in 5 years ( estimated ) = 757
Estimated index in 2010 = 1746 + 757
= 2503
Estimated index in 2020 = 3260 + 757
= 4017
Value of building in 2010 = 1746 million dollar
Value of similar building - X
X / 1746 = index in 2020 (probable ) / index in 2010
X / 7.25 = 4017 / 2503
X = 11.63 million dollar
Answer:
C. Buddy cannot be a creditor of the corporation after the redemption.
Explanation:
"A stock redemption that terminates a shareholder’s entire stock ownership in a corporation will qualify for sale or exchange treatment under § 302(b)(3). The attribution rules generally apply in determining whether the shareholder’s stock ownership has been completely terminated. However, the family attribution rules do not apply to a complete termination redemption if the following conditions are met:
The former shareholder has no interest, other than that of a creditor, in the corporation for at least 10 years after the redemption (including an interest as an officer, director, or employee).
The former shareholder files an agreement to notify the IRS of any prohibited interest acquired within the 10-year period and to retain all necessary records pertaining to the redemption during this time period."
Reference: South-Western, Thomson. “Chapter 5.” To Qualify for Sale or Exchange Treatment, a Stock Redemption Generally Must Result in a Substantial Reduction in a Shareholde, 2005,
Answer:
Gap between the supply curve and the market price.
Explanation:
Producers surplus refers to the surplus that a producer of a commodity can obtain. The producers surplus is the difference between the producer's willingness to accept the price and the actual price they have received.
Producers surplus = Actual market price - Willingness to accept the price
Graphically, it is the area between the upper portion of supply curve and the market price.
Answer:
Positive Statements: 1st & 2nd ; Normative Statements: 3rd & 4th
Explanation:
Positive Economics is <u>objective</u> & <u>facts</u> based <u>actual</u> economic issue description , explaining verifiable phenomenas (causal relationships).
Normative Economics is <u>subjective</u> & opinion based conclusive <u>solutions</u> to economic issues, including '<u>ought to be</u>' unverifiable suggestions.
1. Lung cancer kills millions of people each year: reflects actual objective verifiable fact about an economic (health) issue.
2. Too many people smoke: denotes another actual objective variable fact connected to (potential cause of) the above economic (health) issue.
So , these two are Positive Statements.
3. If the government were to increase taxes on cigarettes, fewer people would smoke : Is subjective opinion based probable solution to the above economic (health) issue.
4. The government should increase taxes on cigarettes : Is an 'ought to' suggestion for an economic participant (govt) to solve the above economic (health) issue.
So , these two are Normative Statements
<span>The principal amount is $12,500. From the above statement the interest for two months is $220. And the annual interest is 1320. This is 10.56% of the principal amount. So the rate of interest in 10.56</span>