- It should be noted that the failure to vaccinate some children isn an external cost. [See the attached graph]
- The social cost curve is also indicated accordingly.
- From an efficiency perspective, subsidizing vaccines <em>does</em> make sense because, without the subsidy, the equilibrium quantity is <em>less</em> than the socially optimal quantity.
- The school nurse suggests publishing a list of which kids did not get a flu vaccine, in the hope that public shaming will lead people to vaccinate their children. The school nurse is hoping that social norms will act like a <em>punishment </em>and lead the market to a<em> socially efficient </em>
- The flaws that the school nurse's suggestion have are:
- People that feel passionate about not vaccinating are typically doing so for medical or religious reasons and will not sway to social norms or peer pressure. (Option B)
- The school would potentially face a lawsuit because sharing protected health information (PHI), like immunization records, without parents' consent could be a violation depending on the regulations of the state. (Option C)
<h3>What is social Cost?</h3>
In neoclassical economics, the social cost is the total of the transaction's private costs plus the costs imposed on consumers as a result of being exposed to the process for which they are not rewarded or taxed.
In other words, it is the total of internal and external expenses.
Learn more about social cost:
brainly.com/question/28116338
#SPJ1
<span>Decrease by $57,400 per month.
Looks look at the cash flow for continuing to produce product a and discontinuing product a.
Continuing to produce
Income = 15900 * $29 = $461,100
Variable Expenses = 15900 * 23 = $365,700
Fixed overhead = $109,000
Total cash flow = $461,100 - $365,700 - $109,000 = -$13,600
So the Lusk company is losing $13,600 per month while producing product a. Let's see what happens if they stop producing it.
Income = $0
Variable Expenses = $0
Fixed overhead = $71,000
Total cash flow = $0 - $71,000 = -$71,000
So if they stop producing it, their fixed overhead decreases, but is still at $71,000 per month, for a total loss per month of $71,000.
The conclusion is to either lose $13,600 per month, or $71,000 per month. So if they stop production of product a, their loss per month will increase by $57,400.</span>
Answer:
Jasmine recognize $1,940 this year if she uses the accrual method of accounting.
Explanation:
The Accrual or Matching Concept in accounting requires revenues and expenses to be recorded in the period i which they occur or incur.
The entry to record the receipt of payment is :
Cash $15,520 (debit)
Unearned Rental Income $15,520 (credit)
By the end of the year on 31 December, 4 months rent income starting September will have been earned and entries are as follows :
Unearned Rental Income $1,940 (debit)
Rental Income $1,940 (credit)
Rental Income calculation = $15,520 × 4 / 32
= $1,940
Answer:
Zero- there is a $10 Million exemption equivalent ( d )
Explanation:
Annual exemption to be ignored = $15000
$1 million to an irrevocable trust
taxable gifts = $6 million
A) The amount of gift tax Nathan must remit in 2017 ignoring annual exemption
The gift tax must remit in 2017 is zero because there is a $10 million exemption because of the annual exception ( even if the annual exception is ignored ) and the lifetime benefits on taxable gifts that Nathan has is approximately $11.4 million, hence he wont be remitting any amount on gift tax in 2017
