By increasing demand through monetary and fiscal stimulus, expansionary policy aims to stimulate an economy. The goal of expansionary policy is to stop or lessen economic downturns and recessions.
<h3>How do countries expand their territories?</h3>
State-collapse When the stated purpose of expansionism is to retake lost territory or seize ancestral lands, anarchy, reunification, or pan-nationalism are occasionally used to excuse and legitimise it.
Imperialism is the governmental policy, practise, or advocacy of expanding power and dominion, particularly through direct territorial acquisition or by seizing control of other areas and peoples on a political and economic level.
Economic, strategic, religious, and political factors are the four main drivers of imperialism. With the aid of these motivations, powerful empires were able to conquer new lands and introduce fresh cultures and languages to both the colonised nations and the nations that were doing the colonising.
To learn more about territories visit:
brainly.com/question/21152582
#SPJ13
The reason is very simple - profit.
The rabbits were not worth much to the Europeans, but were to the Aztecs, but the cocoa beans for the Europeans were like gold. They were a very attractive exotic product from which unique and unseen things were made. In the European market the cocoa beans had enormous price, and the demand for it was very high especially from the aristocracy which loved it and didn't speared money for it.
Answer:
I think A . Had waged war with and been enslaved by other Europeansettlers.
Explanation:
I think they depend on stores because stores donate things to nongovernmental organizations. Also, surrounding states when a natural disaster occurs people from other states support these organizations. They depend on support and hope to get through whatever there going through.
One negative about the slave trade was that it tended to increase the amount of war that occurred in West Africa. The reason for this is that European (and American) slave traders did not simply go out into the African countryside and kidnap their own slaves. Instead, they bought slaves from the coastal kingdoms. Those kingdoms generally got slaves to sell through war and through raids against inland tribes. Because the slave traders wanted more slaves, the coastal kingdoms were encouraged to wage more wars and conduct more raids against their neighbors. In addition, those kingdoms were provided with things like guns in exchange for slaves. This helped those kingdoms have a greater capacity for waging war.
This brings us to the one (short-term) benefit of the slave trade: it initially helped the coastal kingdoms. Those kingdoms became richer and more powerful because they were able to get guns, money, and other things in exchange for the slaves.
However, even these kingdoms were hurt in the long term. This is because the slave trade hurt all of West Africa. First, the slave trade took away millions of Africans (men more than women) in the prime of their lives. This badly disrupted both the cultures and the economies of the African nations. Because they were disrupted, they were less able to progress. The link below argues that the slave trade made it harder for Africa to enjoy an agrarian revolution and, in turn, an industrial revolution. This is because the men and women who could have helped make these revolutions were being taken into slavery. Because the African nations did not develop economically and because their societies were weakened, they were unable to effectively resist the Europeans when the Europeans started to colonize Africa.
Thus, we can say that Africa was badly harmed by the slave trade. The trade made war more common, harmed the economies and societies of the nations from which the slaves came, and eventually made it easier for Africa to be colonized by the Europeans.
