1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aleksklad [387]
3 years ago
15

Describe the scene at the British coffeehouse. How is Thomas Rowlandson's portrayal of eighteenth-century society different from

Lemonnier's?
History
1 answer:
Lelechka [254]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Thomas Rowlandson's portrayal of eighteenth-century society was different from Lemonnier's in the following way.

French artist Anicet-Charles Limmonier depicts the scene of aristocratic people at the Mari Rodette Geoffrin's saloon. These aristocratic people are paying attention to the lecture of famous Enlightenment thinker Voltaire. The painting is very colorful and we can see the elegant apparel of the aristocrats.

On the other hand, the portrayal of the famous British cartoonist Thomas  Rowlandson's portraits middle-class people in a totally different environment: a middle-class Caffe, in Salisbury Marketplace. The environment is more relaxed, and patrons are reading newspapers and having light conversations.

In the times of the Enlightenment, people used to meet at coffee shops or saloons to talk about the issues of the time.

You might be interested in
Canada is home to an independence movement, in which a portion of the population wishes to have Quebec become an independent cou
Nataly_w [17]

Answer:

when immigrants were seen to be moving into the area in large numbers and the inhabitants of Quebec felt it would become difficult for them to protect the French language and the French culture.

Explanation:

The Quebec sovereignty movement is a political movement in Canada that has been put in place with unique ideologies and concepts that are formed around advocating independence for the province of Quebec. It has been agreed that this development came into being, when immigrants were seen to be moving into the area in large numbers and the inhabitants of Quebec felt it would become difficult for them to protect the French language and the French culture. They came up to ask for separation from canada

3 0
3 years ago
Why was the freedmen's bureau established
iVinArrow [24]
In order to help millions of former black slaves and poor whites in the South after the Civil War
6 0
3 years ago
What is not a reason given in the article as to why the Soviet Union continuing to gain power was a problem for the United State
fenix001 [56]

Answer:

<em>Hello There Again. the correct Answer B. </em><u><em>Soviet Union seeks to spread a "fanatic" belief in communism, which is opposite the beliefs of the United States.</em></u>

Explanation:

Because The concept of "socialism in one country" was conceived by Stalin in his struggle against Leon Trotsky and his concept of permanent revolution. In 1924, Trotsky published his pamphlet Lessons of October in which he stated that socialism in the Soviet Union would fail because of the backward state of economic development unless a world revolution began. Stalin responded to Trotsky's pamphlet with his article, "October and Comrade Trotsky's Theory of Permanent Revolution". In it, Stalin stated, that he did not believe an inevitable conflict between the working class and the peasants would take place, further adding that "socialism in one country is completely possible and probable". Stalin held the view common amongst most Bolsheviks at the time; there was possibility of real success for socialism in the Soviet Union despite the country's backwardness and international isolation. While Grigoriy Zinoviev, Lev Kamenev and Nikolai Bukharin, together with Stalin, opposed Trotsky's theory of permanent revolution, they diverged on how socialism could be built. According to Bukharin, Zinoviev and Kamenev supported the resolution of the 14th Conference (held in 1925) which stated that "we cannot complete the building of socialism due to our technological backwardness." Despite the rather cynical attitude, Zinoviev and Kamenev did believe that a defective form of socialism could be constructed. At the 14th Conference, Stalin reiterated his position, claiming that socialism in one country was feasible despite the capitalist blockade of the country. After the conference, Stalin wrote "Concerning the Results of the XIV Conference of the RCP(b)", in which he stated that the peasantry would not turn against the socialist system because he believed they had a self-interest in preserving.[43] The contradictions which would arise with the peasantry during the socialist transition, Stalin surmised, could "be overcome by our own efforts". He concluded that the only viable threat to socialism in the Soviet Union was a military intervention.

In late 1925, Stalin received a letter from a party official which stated that his position of "Socialism in One Country" was in contradiction with Friedrich Engels own writings on the subject. Stalin countered, stating that Engels' writings 'reflected' "the era of pre-monopoly capitalism, the pre-imperialist era when there were not yet the conditions of an uneven, abrupt development of the capitalist countries." From 1925 onwards, Bukharin began writing extensively on the subject, and in 1926, Stalin wrote On Questions of Leninism, which contained his best-known writings on the subject. Trotsky, with the publishing of Leninism, began countering Bukharin's and Stalin's arguments, claiming that socialism in one country was possible, but only in the short-run, and claimed that without a world revolution it would be impossible to safeguard the Soviet Union from the "restoration of bourgeoisie relations". Zinoviev on the other hand, disagreed with both Trotsky and Bukharin and Stalin, holding instead steadfast to Lenin's own position from 1917 to 1922, and continued to claim that only a defecting form of socialism could be constructed in the Soviet Union without a world revolution. Bukharin, by now, began arguing for the creation of an autarkic economic model, while Trotsky, in contrast, claimed that the Soviet Union had to participate in the international division of labour to develop. In contrast to Trotsky and Bukharin, Stalin did not believe a world revolution was possible, claiming in 1938 that a world revolution was in fact impossible, and claiming that Engels was wrong on the matter. At the 18th Congress, Stalin took the theory to its inevitable conclusion, claiming that the communist mode of production could be conceived in one country. He rationalised this by claiming that the state could exist in a communist society, as long as the Soviet Union was encircled by capitalism. However, surprisingly, with the establishment of socialist regimes in Eastern Europe, Stalin claimed that socialism in one country was only possible in a large country like the Soviet Union, and that the other states, in order to survive, had to follow the Soviet line.

6 0
3 years ago
How are the beliefs in reincarnation and moksha related?
aivan3 [116]
Both describe how ones actions will affect people around them :)
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELPPPPPPP The Battle of the Bulge was significant because it: ended Nazi dominance of the Atlantic. protected the Suez canal. s
gtnhenbr [62]

<em>D. Was Hitler's last chance to defeat the Allies.</em>

Explanation:

The Battle of the Bulge was a very important battle against the Allies and the Germans and was Hitler's last chance to defeat the Allies.

Before the Battle of the Bulge, Allies had recently defeated Germany before and had helped most of Europe against German rule. By then, the Allies thought that Germany had essentially given up and World War II was over, but Hitler had one last plan.

Hitler ended up going forward into the American troops, trying to break the front lines. The Allies were not ready for this and many ended up dying, which caused Germany to go forward. As Germany continued to advance, the American troops finally started pushing the troops back and eventually started getting the upper hand against German troops.

This is a very famous battle because of the small fights that occurred and the courage that was with the American troops. Many of the American troops had to hold out until backup arrived since they were not expecting this attack from Germany. Although Germany caught them by surprise and at first started winning against the Allies, they pushed them back and won the battle.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following groups was expected to benefit from New Deal programs like Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) and the Work
    5·1 answer
  • According to islam, when and where did muhammad first receive words from allah?
    12·1 answer
  • What does the louisana purchase suggest about the goal of manifest destiny?
    11·1 answer
  • What does the Monroe Doctrine state
    10·2 answers
  • Who wanted the individual states to keep more governmental power?
    9·1 answer
  • Hellenistic period facts
    5·1 answer
  • What did the Whig Party gain from the Louisiana State Constitution of 1852?
    15·2 answers
  • Explain scramble and partion i<br>n african​
    7·2 answers
  • 1. What were the plans of government introduced at the Constitutional Convention, and how did they shape the resulting Constitut
    11·1 answer
  • Guys please help 50 Points
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!