I keep getting this wrong. Can someone help please? Its the order of proofs in geometry. Thank you!
1 answer:
You might be interested in
The area of the triangle is 14.1 square meters
<h3>How to determine the triangle area?</h3>The side lengths are given as:
5m, 6m and 9m
Calculate the semi-perimeter (s) using
s = (5 + 6 + 9)/2
Evaluate
s = 10
The area is then calculated as:
This gives
Evaluate the products
Evaluate the exponent
Area = 14.1
Hence, the area of the triangle is 14.1 square meters
Read more about areas at:
#SPJ1
Answer:
As the sample size increases, the variability decreases.
Step-by-step explanation:
Variability is the measure of actual entries from mean. The less the deviations the less would be the variance.
For a sample of size n, we have by central limit theorem the mean of sample follows a normal distribution for random samples of large size.
X bar will have std deviation as
where s is the square root of variance of sample
Thus we find the variability denoted by std deviation is inversely proportion of square root of sample size.
Hence as sample size increases, std error decreases.
As the sample size increases, the variability decreases.
Exponential functions are related to logarithmic functions in that they are inverse functions. Exponential functions move quickly up towards a [y] infinity, bounded by a vertical asymptote (aka limit), whereas logarithmic functions start quick but then taper out towards an [x] infinity, bounded by a horizontal asymptote (aka limit).
If we use the natural logarithm (ln) as an example, the constant "e" is the base of ln, such that:
ln(x) = y, which is really stating that the base (assumed "e" even though not shown), that:
if we try to solve for y in this form it's nearly impossible, that's why we stick with ln(x) = y
but to find the inverse of the form:
switch the x and y, then solve for y:
So the exponential function is the inverse of the logarithmic one, f(x) = ln x
If we use the natural logarithm (ln) as an example, the constant "e" is the base of ln, such that:
ln(x) = y, which is really stating that the base (assumed "e" even though not shown), that:
if we try to solve for y in this form it's nearly impossible, that's why we stick with ln(x) = y
but to find the inverse of the form:
switch the x and y, then solve for y:
So the exponential function is the inverse of the logarithmic one, f(x) = ln x