Answer:
C). Beckett begins with the idea of endings.
Explanation:
'Endgame' by Samuel Beckett works upon the existentialist philosophy and belongs to the 'theater of absurd.' It is often considered as the follow up of Beckett's classic work 'Waiting for Godot.'
As per the question, <u>the play authorizes the idea of circularity as the play begins and ends on the same note i.e. 'intertwining of beginning and end</u>.' It is based upon the key idea of 'hopelessness' and the characters are endlessly waiting for 'nothing' but death. Clove internally feels 'he need to live' and plans of leaving but could not and goes back to the same situation(reflects absurdity and nothingness). Thus, the entire play moves around this very idea and hence, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
The term that best matches this definition: a statement that seems to contradict itself is Paradox. Thus the correct answer is D.
<h3>What is a Paradox?</h3>
A paradox is a statement or assertion that, appears illogical or mismatched at first view but after closer examination, may reveal to be well established or true. It depicts an object that combines opposing traits or characteristics.
A claim that violates one's knowledge and is logically self-contradictory is called a paradox. The premise is accurate despite having a good explanation for it. It has aspects that conflict with one another while also being connected.
A paradox's main function is to draw people's attention and get them to have a different opinion. A paradox is a narrative device that encourages the reader to think more carefully or critically.
Therefore, option D Paradox is the appropriate answer.
Learn more about Paradox, here:
brainly.com/question/24272738
#SPJ2
The answer is A :)
Hope this helps!
Once again, Melville devotes a chapter to the minutiae of the whaling industry, but in this case he extends his description of the whale line to its more metaphorical implications. Ishmael compares the whale line to a noose, and in turn compares this noose to the mortality of all humans. Once again, this metaphor takes on sinister implications, a reminder of impending death and destruction that may come at any moment.
The pigs take charge and begin to control the other animals. Napoleon uses Squealer and the dogs to stop the animals' questions about the windmill. Squealer spoke so persuasively, and the three dogs who happened to be with him growled so threateningly, that they accepted his explanation without further questions.
