Answer:
Speak up for what you care about. ...
Volunteer or donate to a global organization. ...
Choose fair trade & ethically made gifts. ...
Listen to others' stories. ...
Stay connected with social movements. ...
Stand up against discrimination.
Explanation:
YASS I HELPED
Answer:
The correct answer is because of the rebellious and bold spirit the flapper inspired
Explanation:
The Flappers were a generation of woman that used a particular style in their clothing, the music they heard (mostly Jazz), the hair cut they had that was called the "bob cut", usually weared a lot of make up, they drank hard liquours, often drive at high speeds and had other behaviours that were not considered normal in a woman in the 1920's and therefore because of this rebellious attitude the flappers inspired they symbolized change for the woman in the 1920's.
Answer: True
An ethical dilemma is a question that involves choosing between different moral principles, neither one of which is objectively better. Often, picking one of the options means you are transgressing the other one.
Because it is a difficult situation with no objectively better answer, the help of a person with more experience, in this case your superior, can sometimes be useful. Moreover, there are often regulations at work that help employees navigate these type of situations in a successful way. Finally, ethical dilemmas are particularly difficult to resolve and deal with, and asking for help will always help assert the validity of your claim.
According to the theory of <span>Testa and Livingston (1999), women who have been drinking are more likely to take risks they would not take in normal situations because they're brain ceases to find easy risk-free solutions to otherwise standard situations. They are thus more prone to engage in risky behavior such as accepting a ride from a stranger.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Get in touch with your local Jehovah's Witness branch. They can give you an earful on this subject.
They have religious reasons for objecting to transfusions. When it comes to children, the courts have overruled them saying that the welfare of the child is more important than any medical objection or argument that the witnesses may have.
People with Leukemia at some point in course of their disease, may need a transfusion. Nothing else will do. The cells in blood fight foreign antibodies and transport oxygen to organs that need it. If a patient's own blood can't do it, then a transfusion becomes necessary.
The courts have a right to dictate terms when children are involved. The courts do not have the same right with adults. If an adult chooses to end the suffering, they have that right. There even comes a point (in Canada at least) where death is an option. But an individual patient must give knowledgeable consent to taking his own life.
So medicine has a say in some things and not in others. In the United States, the population has not given up on the rights of the 1st amendment. And medicine can override even those rights.
