The correct answer to this open question is the following.
President Donald Trump changed the course of several US foreign policies.
These are the matches.
Negotiations with Korean Peninsula - nuclear disarmament discussions.
Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action - pulled out of an agreement.
United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement - renegotiated NAFTA.
In this last case, President Trump asked the other two presidents to renegotiate the terms of the trade agreement.
Originally, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) wanted to generate many positive factors for the three countries, Mexico, Canada, and the United States. But as always happen in free trade agreements, the reality shows many different ourcomes for the three of them.
That is why the Congresses of the three countries analyzed the new free trade agreement.
The new agreement is called “USMCA” or United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement and was signed on September 30, 2018.
Answer:
In Russia, efforts to build communism began after Tsar Nicholas II lost his power during the February Revolution, and ended with the dissolution of the USSR in 1991.
<span>Initially, white colonists
viewed Native Americans as helpful and
friendly. They welcomed the Natives
into their settlements, and the colonists
willingly engaged in trade with them.
They hoped to transform the tribes people
into civilized Christians through their
daily contacts. The Native Americans
resented and resisted the colonists'
attempts to change them. Their refusal
to conform to European culture angered
the colonists and hostilities soon broke
out between the two groups. The violence
of their confrontations with the Native
Americans resulted in a shift of English
attitudes towards other races. Colonists
blames their failure to assimilate the
Native Americans into their culture
on racial differences and began to associate
all people of color with negative characteristics.</span>
Answer: 4) the accounts were written by people from different countries
Explanation:
i just took the quiz
<h3>I spent a few years writing about the federal lawsuit of ACLU vs. Yakima, which would become a landmark voting rights lawsuit in Washington state. I remember at the time regular folks, politicians and government officials (all of them white and older) that there was no longer any such thing as voter suppression in the United States of America. That had all been settled in the 1960s, they argued, and the idea that such racist practices existed still today was speculative at best and, besides, impossible to prove. The city lost the lawsuit and was ordered to pay nearly $2 million to the ACLU in addition to a similar number the city wasted litigating the case. The ruling led a few other Central Washington cities with growing (and ignored) Latino populations to preemptively change their council election systems to legally provide for more representation. A couple years later Evergreen State lawmakers approved a state voting rights act to increase representation. Unfortunately, positive developments in Washington state haven’t been seen around much of the country. For nearly a decade, much of the country has gone backwards on voting rights.</h3>
<h2>please mark in brain list </h2>
