1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leya [2.2K]
4 years ago
12

To what degree did foreign influence impact the social, religious, and economic development of two of the following African regi

ons? East Africa West Africa South Africa
History
2 answers:
Tpy6a [65]4 years ago
8 0
As a general impact over all of Africa, foreign invaders, typically from Europe, initially seemed to have a positive impact in the sense that they introduced public schools and basic hygiene, but the also had many negative impacts because eventually, in the 18-1900's when many African nations became independent countries and forced the Europeans out, they were left with little government, political, or economic skills which is why many of the African nations of the modern day are still considered developing countries.
Kay [80]4 years ago
4 0

<u><em>The so-called</em></u> "<u>commercial transition</u>", <u><em>by which foreign influence had an impact on social, religious and economic development in Africa</em></u>, <u>was completed in West Africa before it affected East Africa</u>.  


<u><em>The correct answer is</em></u>: <u>East Africa, and West Africa</u>.


You might be interested in
How does the fourth principle, concerning liberty, connect to the idea that certain guaranteed freedoms in American life are lim
scoundrel [369]

Answer:

Liberty, in philosophy, involves free will as contrasted with determinism.[1] In politics, liberty consists of the social and political freedoms to which all community members are entitled. In theology, liberty is freedom from the effects of "sin, spiritual servitude, [or] worldly ties.

Generally, liberty is distinctly differentiated from freedom in that freedom is primarily, if not exclusively, the ability to do as one wills and what one has the power to do; whereas liberty concerns the absence of arbitrary restraints and takes into account the rights of all involved. As such, the exercise of liberty is subject to capability and limited by the rights of others.

hope this helps! :)

8 0
4 years ago
How have international relations shaped and guided the development of the United States, specifically the nation’s government, p
MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Answer:

International relations, the study of the relations of states with each other and with international organizations and certain subnational entities (e.g., bureaucracies, political parties, and interest groups). It is related to a number of other academic disciplines, including political science, geography, history, economics, law, sociology, psychology, and philosophy.

The field of international relations emerged at the beginning of the 20th century largely in the West and in particular in the United States as that country grew in power and influence. Whereas the study of international relations in the newly founded Soviet Union and later in communist China was stultified by officially imposed Marxist ideology, in the West the field flourished as the result of a number of factors: a growing demand to find less-dangerous and more-effective means of conducting relations between peoples, societies, governments, and economies; a surge of writing and research inspired by the belief that systematic observation and inquiry could dispel ignorance and serve human betterment; and the popularization of political affairs, including foreign affairs. The traditional view that foreign and military matters should remain the exclusive preserve of rulers and other elites yielded to the belief that such matters constituted an important concern and responsibility of all citizens. This increasing popularization of international relations reinforced the idea that general education should include instruction in foreign affairs and that knowledge should be advanced in the interests of greater public control and oversight of foreign and military policy.

This new perspective was articulated by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson (1913–21) in his program for relations between the Great Powers following a settlement of World War I. The first of his Fourteen Points, as his program came to be known, was a call for “open covenants of peace, openly arrived at” in place of the secret treaties that were believed to have contributed to the outbreak of the war. The extreme devastation caused by the war strengthened the conviction among political leaders that not enough was known about international relations and that universities should promote research and teaching on issues related to international cooperation and war and peace.

International relations scholarship prior to World War I was conducted primarily in two loosely organized branches of learning: diplomatic history and international law. Involving meticulous archival and other primary-source research, diplomatic history emphasized the uniqueness of international events and the methods of diplomacy as it was actually conducted. International law—especially the law of war—had a long history in international relations and was viewed as the source of fundamental normative standards of international conduct. The emergence of international relations was to broaden the scope of international law beyond this traditional focal point.

6 0
3 years ago
Why was Japan stripped of overseas territory and military resources after World War 2?
makvit [3.9K]
Why was Japan stripped of overseas territory and military resources after World War 2?

A. The United States need control of the Japanese economy.
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When President Roosevelt said he had “lost the battle but won the war” what “war” was he referring to?
Mumz [18]

Answer:

He was referring to his plan to "pack the courts" with judges he endorsed.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What were good things john locke did? help plsss!
Nastasia [14]

Answer:

He trained in medicine, he was a key advocate of the empirical approaches of the Scientific Revolution.

Explanation:

He laid much of the groundwork for the Enlightenment and made central contributions to the development of liberalism.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • HELLPPPPPP PLEAS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111The US refuses to join the League of Nations WAS IT CAUSE OF EFFECT
    15·1 answer
  • Louisiana's Governor Parker ignored the needs of which group of people.
    11·1 answer
  • Which best explains how the structure of the executive office of the president helps fulfill Presidency’s office’s role?
    5·2 answers
  • Patagonia is well suited for what kind of agricultural activity? growing bananas raising sheep grazing cattle cultivating coffee
    13·2 answers
  • in order for Japan and Turkey to compete against the foreign threat of western imperialism they had to both
    7·1 answer
  • The graph shows the United States in the late 1800s.
    7·1 answer
  • Kahulugan ng gobyerno​
    12·1 answer
  • Please help it's due in a few minutes !! ;-;
    11·2 answers
  • Which best describes an accomplishment of the woman suffrage movement?
    11·1 answer
  • What makes the us Congress more powerful than other nation’s legislative branches?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!