Answer:
Option D: All of the above.
Explanation:
Each option presents solid arguments to present her point. Choosing one above the rest would be impossible.
Artistans
hope this helps
hope my spelling is right
Thank you for posting your question here. It can be considered to be consistent with the given facts. As you know, an hypothesis, much less a theory, is never proven. It can be shown to be consistent with given observations. As new observations are collected, the given hypothesis may have to be modified.
If the celery became crisp when it was soaked in ice water, then clearly that the water has rehydrated the celery is a reasonable hypothesis. But did it have to be ice cold water? Would room temperature water work? What about boiling water?
And thus most of the time, the success of an hypothesis leads to the design of new experiments to test and expand the original hypothesis.
The Constitution, unlike the the Articles of Confederation, would make the central government stronger, which was something many people feared. The Anti-Federalists complained that it would threaten liberties and would not protect individual rights.
I hope this is helpful! :D
Answer:
Not fertile.
Explanation:
Laterite soil not suits for agriculture because it is not fertile soil than can provide essential nutrients needed by the plants. Laterite soil is acidic in nature and also has less water-retaining capacity. The soil of Laterite lacks nitrogen, potassium , urea and phosphoric acid and contains more iron, aluminum, manganese that make the soil not fit for cultivation purposes.
