Answer:
If we compare the p value and using the significance level given
we have
so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% or 1% of significance we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Step-by-step explanation:
It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.
The significance level is not provided but we can assume it as
. First we need to calculate the degrees of freedom like this:

The next step would be calculate the p value for this test. Since is a bilateral test or two tailed test, the p value would be:
If we compare the p value and using the significance level given
we have
so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% or 1% of significance we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
For the pet the fraction is 2/3 because there is a fish,cat and a dog only cats and dogs have 4 legs and the fraction for the toy or the book is 1/2 because there are 2 objects and she can only get 1
3/4 = (2*3) / (2* 4) = 6/8
7/8.
Is 3/4 greater than 7/8?
Is like asking is 6/8 greater than 7/8? Because 3/4 is equivalent to 6/8.
The answer is No.
Answer:
The answer is C. The translation of a line is a pair of parallel lines.
Step-by-step explanation:
A, B, and D are true. C is <em>not</em> true, and therefore the correct answer.
We start qt 72 degrees,
3 1/5 = 16/5 = 3.2 x 10 minutes = 32 degrees.
72 + 32 = 104 degrees.
Cool Time:
4 2/7 = 30/7 = 4.28571429 x 7 minutes = 30 degrees.
104 - 30 = 74
So we went from 72 to 74 degrees, that is a 2 degree difference.
This is what i got, i hope i understood the question correctly.v