Choosing a random sample is an effective way to select participants as everyone has the same chance of being part of the study.
Each sample has an equal chance of being chosen as part of the sampling procedure known as random sampling. A randomly selected sample is intended to be a fair reflection of the entire population.
Random sampling makes sure that the findings you get from your sample should be close to what you would have gotten if you had measured the complete population. All the units in the population have an identical chance of being chosen using the simplest random sample.
Researchers can generalize about a particular community and remove bias by using basic random sampling. Without conducting a survey or gathering data from every member of the population, statistical techniques can be used to draw conclusions and make predictions about the population.
To learn more about random sampling refer to:
brainly.com/question/12719645
#SPJ9
There is this saying in science" corellation does not imply causation". So even in a case of a correlation, it does not mean that one event causes the other. So a correlation does not enable drawing conclusions of causation.
The goal of locking down is to observe people using the application to discover what errors they may make with it and to identify areas that require modification.
<h3>What is
modification?</h3>
A modification is a change or alteration that is made to improve the functionality of something. If you want to change something — that is, modify it — you must make a change. Many things require modification as they age or simply because they can be improved.
A modification is a made change or the act of changing something. When you have a plan in place and make a minor change to it, such as building a wall one inch taller, this is an example of modification.
A modification is typically defined as a change in what is being taught to or expected of the student.
To know more about modification follow the link:
brainly.com/question/25421984
#SPJ4
The right answer is Dr. Kwame Nkrumah.
Answer:
Greek citizenship stemmed from the fusion of two elements, (a) the notion of the individual state as a 'thing' with boundaries, a history, and a power of decision, and (b) the notion of its inhabitants participating in its life as joint proprietors.
Explanation: .Ancient Greek and Roman societies granted their citizens rights and responsibilities that slaves, foreigners, and other people who were considered subordinate did not possess. Citizenship rights changed over time. While the Greeks tended to limit citizenship to children born to citizens, the Romans were more willing to extend citizenship to include others who had previously been excluded, such as freed slaves.
Citizenship in Ancient Greece. In Greece, citizenship meant sharing in the duties and privileges of membership in the polis, or city-state*. Citizens were required to fight in defense of the polis and expected to participate in the political life of the city by voting. In return, they were the only ones allowed to own land and to hold political office. Because citizens controlled the wealth and power of the polis, the Greeks carefully regulated who could obtain citizenship. In general, only those free residents who could trace their ancestry to a famous founder of the city were considered citizens. Only on rare occasions would a polis grant citizenship to outsiders, usually only to those who possessed great wealth or valuable skills.
* city-state independent state consisting of a city and its surrounding territory
