1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Makovka662 [10]
3 years ago
13

Imagine that you are General Santa Anna, commander of the Mexican troops. You have the choice of allowing the rebels at the Alam

o to go free, or attack them. You know most of the enemy is unarmed and untrained; however, they have rebelled against Mexico and refuse to come out of the Alamo. Explain in an essay: Attack or try to negotiate (try to talk)? What would you do?
History
1 answer:
Rufina [12.5K]3 years ago
5 0
I would try to fight to take what’s mine
You might be interested in
7. which statement is false when when comparing the political systems of the united states and great britain?
ollegr [7]
That america is the best in world
hope it helps
4 0
3 years ago
How do you reach enlightenment in Buddhism?
IRISSAK [1]

Answer:

Through meditation .......

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how leaders and families groups made economic decisions and provides framework for future city state development?
Nat2105 [25]

Answer:

if you scroll down to the bottom of google the asnwer hould sbe there

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The video points out that our Founding Fathers did not fully consider the role of political parties when drafting the Constituti
tekilochka [14]

Answer:

Thanks!

Explanation:

oday, it may seem impossible to imagine the U.S. government without its two leading political parties, Democrats and Republicans. But in 1787, when delegates to the Constitutional Convention gathered in Philadelphia to hash out the foundations of their new government, they entirely omitted political parties from the new nation’s founding document.

This was no accident. The framers of the new Constitution desperately wanted to avoid the divisions that had ripped England apart in the bloody civil wars of the 17th century. Many of them saw parties—or “factions,” as they called them—as corrupt relics of the monarchical British system that they wanted to discard in favor of a truly democratic government.

“It was not that they didn’t think of parties,” says Willard Sterne Randall, professor emeritus of history at Champlain College and biographer of six of the Founding Fathers. “Just the idea of a party brought back bitter memories to some of them.”

6 0
4 years ago
Is government necessary? Why or why not?
zheka24 [161]

Answer:yes

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which compromise was passed in response to the Mexican Cession?
    14·1 answer
  • Why are reasons people came to New Mexico?​
    8·1 answer
  • What happened when the US occupied Japan after World War 2? I NEED THIS ASAP
    5·1 answer
  • Place the following events in chronological order.
    10·2 answers
  • what does the phrase, "It is necessary that his power be such that no one can hope to escape him" mean?
    10·1 answer
  • Match each word to the phrase that best defines it.
    9·1 answer
  • Tiberius, Caligula, and Nero seem to be execrable men. Why do you think the Romans tolerated them for as long as they did?
    8·1 answer
  • In the United States, the belief that "individual rights are not absolute but relative" is BEST illustrated by the statement tha
    8·1 answer
  • Why were there famines during the British raj?
    10·1 answer
  • Why do the two abolitionists want to win the case in the movie amistad
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!