Answer:
Contract is a branch of private law. It thus concerns private obligations that arise in respect of symmetrical relations among natural and artificial persons rather than public obligations that arise in respect of hierarchical relations between persons and the state. Contract, at least in its orthodox expression, is distinctive for concerning chosen, or voluntary, obligations—that is, obligations constituted by the intentions of the contracting parties. This entry describes doctrinal and theoretical accounts of contract law with a special emphasis on the relationship between contract law and two near-neighbors—tort law and fiduciary law.
Explanation:
Answer:
The recording and storage of information related to a case have changed by using databases to help compare bullets, drugs, and trademarks found at a crime scene or during an investigation.
Undoubtedly, the aspect of forensic science that has had the greatest impact on society is that of DNA fingerprinting. ... The advances in DNA profiling have also led to the exonerations of many former criminals. Old cases have been re-opened, and with DNA testing, many supposed culprits have been proven innocent.
Explanation:
Answer:
d. Larceny by trick.
Explanation:
Larceny by trick is distinguishable in that a defendant who commits larceny by trick obtains only possession of the personal property of another, not title of that property.
For example if you ask a person to borrow their phone but have no intention of giving it back
Answer:
Yes, it can be heard in a federal court.
Explanation:
A court is a place in which people are charged and determined if they are guilty or innocent the court is also a place to settle dispute or disagreement between two or more parties(a place to settle criminal and civil legal cases).
There are legal cases that only should be heard at a state level or state courts and some that are needed to be heard at the federal court. This depend on several factors or reasons to be heard whether in state courts or at the federal courts.
The cases in the question can be heard in the federal court since the law concerning pollution has jurisdiction over federal Court.
