let the customer drink it?
Answer:
1. Ending inventory = $3519
2. Cost of Goods Sold = $21030
3. Sales Revenue = $27279
4. Gross Profit = $6249
Explanation:
FIFO method of inventory valuation is whereby the stock that first comes into the business, leaves first. This is common in perishable inventory such as vegetables or fruits.
Jan 1. Beginning inventory: 53 units x $45 = $2385
Total
53 units x $45 = $2385
Apr 7. Purchase 133 units x $47 = $6251
Total
53 units x $45 = $2385
133 units x $47 = $6251
Jul 16. Purchase 203 units x $50 = $10150
Total
53 units x $45 = $2385
133 units x $47 = $6251
203 units x $50 = $10150
Oct 6. Purchase 113 units x $51 = $5763
53 units x $45 = $2385
133 units x $47 = $6251
203 units x $50 = $10150
113 units x $51 = $5763
1. Ending inventory = 502 - 433 = 69 hence,
69 units x $51 = $3519
2. Cost of Goods Sold =
[$2385 + $6251 + $10150 + (44 units x $51)] = $21030
OR $24549 - 3519 = $21030
3. Sales Revenue =
433 units x $63 = $27279
4. Gross Profit = Sales Revenue - Cost of Goods Sold hence,
$27279 - 21030 = $6249
Is this a question or a statement?
I suggest you should get a career rather than a job. It sounds better and should help you focus on that something
Answer:
NO, court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over the landscaper's contract claim
Explanation:
given data
landscape work = $30,000
seeking in damages = $100,000
solution
landscaper assert and maintain claim against an home owner for breach of contract is no because court have diversity of an citizenship in the jurisdiction over an home owner for negligence claims .
we know that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure permit only counter claims and federal court have not any subject matter jurisdiction over an landscaper contract claims