1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hodyreva [135]
3 years ago
7

How did the monarchy of England differ from from monarchies in continental Europe toward the end of the reformation?

History
1 answer:
Katen [24]3 years ago
4 0

i guess it could be b

You might be interested in
Which is a way that Trump has responded to the mass movement for racial justice?
Rzqust [24]

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

After the recent incident of brutal killing of George Floyd, an African American, who was choked to death by a white policeman, President Trump took actions in response to the mass movement for racial justice.

<u>An executive order of </u><u><em>'Law enforcement and accountability' </em></u><u>was signed by President Donald Trump on June 16, 2020 in response to the mass movement for racial justice. The order was signed in the wake of mass movement where people demanded justice for George Floyd. The order demands that police officers need to change the standards of using force including banning chokeholds. The police department, under this order need to change the ways how they train their officers</u>.

Thus the correct answer is option A.

4 0
3 years ago
Question 2 Multiple choice worth 3 points) Which describes why the Declaration of Independence was written? To just separating f
Karolina [17]
Answer) to creat laws to protect the rights of colonists
3 0
2 years ago
During the late 19th and 20th centered united states foreign policy was marked by
babunello [35]
<span>During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, united states foreign policy was marked by intervention in affairs of Latin America.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
3 years ago
Hippie communes were ride sharing cars that looked like small buses
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

Vw wagons are what They are called

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Question 2 of 5
    15·1 answer
  • How did the transportation revolution reshape the United States ?
    15·1 answer
  • When it comes to government Americans value what principles
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following BEST explains why President Lyndon Johnson, subsequent to President Kennedy’s assassination, did not have
    7·2 answers
  • What present-day state was originally a part of Pennsylvania
    11·2 answers
  • The buddha belived that the only way to find truth was to give up ____________
    7·2 answers
  • The American colonists believed that at birth people have rights. What are those rights? A. inalienable rights B. human rights C
    11·2 answers
  • In the years leading up to World War I, European countries like Great Britain and France were very interested in
    6·1 answer
  • NEED HELP ASAP
    6·1 answer
  • PICTURE BELOW
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!